You know, that has been raised before so far as the environment is concerned. Back in the 70's, Carter banned the construction of new Nuclear plants because of the risk of leaks. He felt the waste to be terrorist attacks as well.
Despite the fact that the Beamer cores would extract 95% of the efficiency of uranium, giving the depleted uranium a half life of a few hundred years (meaning we can seal the nuclear waste in another mountain and not have to worry about it being environmentally dangerous to do so, like Yuca Mountain.
And with our Nuclear Plants already showing the signs of age...
Going back to the Environmentalists, I wonder what they'd do if they could. Do they realize the environmental impact destroying dams would do? Or that the dams are the cleanest form of energy that we can find and generates zero radiation? The concept of dams has been around for a long time, a long LONG time.
Despite the fact that the Beamer cores would extract 95% of the efficiency of uranium, giving the depleted uranium a half life of a few hundred years (meaning we can seal the nuclear waste in another mountain and not have to worry about it being environmentally dangerous to do so, like Yuca Mountain.
And with our Nuclear Plants already showing the signs of age...
Going back to the Environmentalists, I wonder what they'd do if they could. Do they realize the environmental impact destroying dams would do? Or that the dams are the cleanest form of energy that we can find and generates zero radiation? The concept of dams has been around for a long time, a long LONG time.
Comment