Originally posted by Skydiver
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by maylet View PostYes, that's true. I said it would be better to wait until they are mature and then kill them (if they're evil Goa'uld and not Tok'ra))
Comment
-
I've always felt that the Tok'ra queen wasn't necessarily born 'good' but learnt how to overcome her genetic memory perhaps by being 'taught' and influenced by her host, I mean it was likely she had a host before Ra discovered she was going against him and imprisoned her, she had the freedom to spawn her Tok'ra children, so she may have been free enough to take a host. If this was the case and she wasn't a mutant but merely a Goa'uld who learned how to be good, then wouldn't it be more likely that this could happen again?
Comment
-
Originally posted by angela21 View PostI've always felt that the Tok'ra queen wasn't necessarily born 'good' but learnt how to overcome her genetic memory perhaps by being 'taught' and influenced by her host, I mean it was likely she had a host before Ra discovered she was going against him and imprisoned her, she had the freedom to spawn her Tok'ra children, so she may have been free enough to take a host. If this was the case and she wasn't a mutant but merely a Goa'uld who learned how to be good, then wouldn't it be more likely that this could happen again?
But have in mind that if she was born evil and then learn to be good, then any Tok'ra that is born from her could become evil toosigpic
Knowledge is power, but how do you use that power defines whether you are good or evil
Comment
-
Originally posted by maylet View PostIf it was the way you say it, yes I think it could happen again.
But have in mind that if she was born evil and then learn to be good, then any Tok'ra that is born from her could become evil too
Consider the Tok'ra's indifference in "Reckoning". Jacob/Selmak were advocating that O'Neill tell Ba'al to withdraw from combat with the Replicators expecting (and not caring much) that he'd fall back to Dakara and wipe out the Jaffa there--including Teal'c.
Comment
-
Originally posted by maylet View PostIf it was the way you say it, yes I think it could happen again.
But have in mind that if she was born evil and then learn to be good, then any Tok'ra that is born from her could become evil too
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jeffala View PostEvil is pretty relative.
Consider the Tok'ra's indifference in "Reckoning". Jacob/Selmak were advocating that O'Neill tell Ba'al to withdraw from combat with the Replicators expecting (and not caring much) that he'd fall back to Dakara and wipe out the Jaffa there--including Teal'c.
Comment
-
Originally posted by angela21 View PostI've always felt that the Tok'ra queen wasn't necessarily born 'good' but learnt how to overcome her genetic memory perhaps by being 'taught' and influenced by her host, I mean it was likely she had a host before Ra discovered she was going against him and imprisoned her, she had the freedom to spawn her Tok'ra children, so she may have been free enough to take a host. If this was the case and she wasn't a mutant but merely a Goa'uld who learned how to be good, then wouldn't it be more likely that this could happen again?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Skydiver View Postand if every single goa'uld is killed in infancy, then there'll never be another queen to learn to be different and thousands of years of knowledge will die with themsigpic
Knowledge is power, but how do you use that power defines whether you are good or evil
Comment
-
Originally posted by maylet View PostI know she's death
Didn't you ever think that one more could be born?
Comment
-
Originally posted by aretood2 View PostThat's one school of thought, however I tend to cringe when someone speaks on such absolute terms unless this belief of yours is more religious than not, which I seriously doubt since most if not all religions demand some sort of absolute truth in morality. There are a host of philosophers who would argue otherwise. The question seems pretty straight foreword as a response to you, if there is no such thing as morality then there is no such thing as right and wrong. Even if Daniel were to kill Carter, that too would not be wrong.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CaramelMonkey View PostOookay... let's not push it.
And that was HUMANS who shared a recent common ancestor, look exactly like us except for some minor surface differences, and are not innately hostile to them
Comment
Comment