Wouldn't the Dekara device be a better idea? You could set it to destroy all people in its radius or something similar. Then you can use all the stuff left over yourself.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
hyperspace windows as weapons?
Collapse
X
-
the dakara weapon is only for stargate bearing planets , and my bomb never needs a planet , also did you see Andromeda in there the nova bomb was never used in a war but the simple existence of it just ended warssigpic
Stargate Mods List
I am webxro , google me .SG,ST,SW,B5 Fan since forever.
StarTrek Excalibur enthusiast and Pardus player .
GW member infractions : 1
Comment
-
the dakara weapon is only for stargate bearing planets
did you see Andromeda in there the nova bomb was never used in a war but the simple existence of it just ended wars
put Project Arcturus whit his own hyperspace drive and clocking and you can use it to bombard a system .Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind. -Albert Einstein
I'm beginning to realize no one actually reads my posts.
Comment
-
said Arcturus not Attero , i mean that thing from trinity .sigpic
Stargate Mods List
I am webxro , google me .SG,ST,SW,B5 Fan since forever.
StarTrek Excalibur enthusiast and Pardus player .
GW member infractions : 1
Comment
-
My appologies, those Ancients and their naming things starting with A.
Arcturus would be a crazy good weapon of mass destruction, though we have no idea what the long-term effect of using it on overload in enemy systems across the galaxy. And it can't be stabilized, so the 5/6th of a solar system blast is the only way to reliably weaponize it.Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind. -Albert Einstein
I'm beginning to realize no one actually reads my posts.
Comment
-
i think that if you place it to the center of the system it would vaporize anything , i mean in that ep it was placed on planet in the Goldilocks zonesigpic
Stargate Mods List
I am webxro , google me .SG,ST,SW,B5 Fan since forever.
StarTrek Excalibur enthusiast and Pardus player .
GW member infractions : 1
Comment
-
I don't think it matters where you place it. The blast was so big you could probably place it orbiting Pluto and still take out Earth. You wouldn't even have to bring it close to the target planet. It wouldn't need a cloak, shields, sensors, or weapons. Have a 304 drop it 10 AUs above the target planet and jump far away. They'll never know what hit them.Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind. -Albert Einstein
I'm beginning to realize no one actually reads my posts.
Comment
-
if you placed it near the center it would destroy the star too and the entire systemsigpic
Stargate Mods List
I am webxro , google me .SG,ST,SW,B5 Fan since forever.
StarTrek Excalibur enthusiast and Pardus player .
GW member infractions : 1
Comment
-
I'm thinking "Trinity's" "five-sixth of a solar system" estimation means 5/6 of the area occupied by the system, which very likely included the star. Anyway, if the point it to eliminate your enemy, what's the difference if you take out the planet or the whole system?Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind. -Albert Einstein
I'm beginning to realize no one actually reads my posts.
Comment
-
well you have 2 choices :
1total carnage
2 90 % destructionsigpic
Stargate Mods List
I am webxro , google me .SG,ST,SW,B5 Fan since forever.
StarTrek Excalibur enthusiast and Pardus player .
GW member infractions : 1
Comment
-
I seem to recall this thread being about using hyperspace windows themselves as weapons, not what kind of weapons we could build that could travel through hyperspace.
Webxro: either way, the weapon is overkill. It would own. Can we leave it at that?Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind. -Albert Einstein
I'm beginning to realize no one actually reads my posts.
Comment
-
you are right then lets draw the conclusions to this treadsigpic
Stargate Mods List
I am webxro , google me .SG,ST,SW,B5 Fan since forever.
StarTrek Excalibur enthusiast and Pardus player .
GW member infractions : 1
Comment
-
As Henry Hays told Anubis, "Not gonna happen"!
Without correct calculations from the ships computer, a ship can't enter a window. O'Neill's 302 dipped just a little to the right and that movement cause the ship to lose the window. It seam that you cant just move to it and get sucked in. The ship has to be perfectly alligned with the center of the window or make contact in a precise moment or you will just pass through it.sigpic
- SteamID user since 2005 -- you can add me - visit steam translation server brazil @ Steelbox
Comment
-
Originally posted by CJ Master View PostWhat's the point of the overkill weapon? A small nuke would take care of the ships just as easily without the risk of it blowing up your own ship as well.
And I like this quote very muchSpoiler:The favorite expressions of humans where killing is concerned are 'if some is good, more is better', 'nothing succeeds like excess' and 'more dakka'. If humans wanted to kill you, you wouldn't just be dead, your body parts would be fling across the planet if it survives. This wasn't humans work, this was somebody else.
Comment
Comment