Originally posted by Buba uognarf
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why is there no tanks in SG?
Collapse
X
-
I think that the whole SGC should be moved to a new location. Namely one where they make a larger gateroom and have space to place vehicles in them.
Make the gate closer the ground like the one in Atlantis. No need for ramps...
That way you can put HMMWVs and LAV25s or Strikers in the room and have them used by the SG teams.
All TPTB has to do is to use 2 or 3 HMMWVs for the SG team missions.
Comment
-
An APC would be my favorite choice. It's got enough room to be used as a personnel carrier (as intended) and as a medical unit. The turret could be taken down and replaced with a railgun (for that extra punch ) and the machine guns on it should be very effective against everything they might encounter.
Comment
-
If I was going to scratch build something I'd just load it up with .30 cal machine guns and maybe a single .50.
Give it computer targeting assistance on all weapons with air and ground attack modes.
Dedicated anti-air weapons aren't necessary against the lame ass aircraft the badguys field and neither are heavy anti-tank weapons. A good computer that can lead a dart or deathglider properly with a .50cal is all that's needed and it doesn't take away space from anti infantry weaponry which is what will see the most use.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OuroborosIf I was going to scratch build something I'd just load it up with .30 cal machine guns and maybe a single .50.
Give it computer targeting assistance on all weapons with air and ground attack modes.
Dedicated anti-air weapons aren't necessary against the lame ass aircraft the badguys field and neither are heavy anti-tank weapons. A good computer that can lead a dart or deathglider properly with a .50cal is all that's needed and it doesn't take away space from anti infantry weaponry which is what will see the most use.
a time to mourn
Comment
-
tanks are stoppable, as someone brought up zat fire travels through metal so your internal stuff is practically fried if you take multiple blasts. and im pretty sure if a death glider targeted a tank it would be screwed. if you add shielding to the tank it would be much larger, and the tank probably wont fit through the gate anyways.
The SGC isnt going on full on military occupation of civilian inhabited worlds. yes we have full blown battle scenes on the ground but we are rescuing our injured soldiers, or we are retreating back. it doesnt fit the SGC's way of doing things. i agree a small, fast and light vehical could be introduced and would be useful.
then there is the issue of things getting in the way for tanks, like cliffs, bodies of water (deep bodies of water), very steep hills. the solution would probably be antigravity, but if you do that its not a tank anymore and why not go the rest of the way and make it a gateship?
and we have seen armed military vehicals off world on sg1, in Forever in a Day we had that small malp thing with a gun on it, maybe 50 cal, and had an armor plating on the front of it but the driver did get shot off it.Their white flags are no match to our guns!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by 2ndgenerationalterantanks are stoppable, as someone brought up zat fire travels through metal so your internal stuff is practically fried if you take multiple blasts. and im pretty sure if a death glider targeted a tank it would be screwed. if you add shielding to the tank it would be much larger, and the tank probably wont fit through the gate anyways.
The SGC isnt going on full on military occupation of civilian inhabited worlds. yes we have full blown battle scenes on the ground but we are rescuing our injured soldiers, or we are retreating back. it doesnt fit the SGC's way of doing things. i agree a small, fast and light vehical could be introduced and would be useful.
then there is the issue of things getting in the way for tanks, like cliffs, bodies of water (deep bodies of water), very steep hills. the solution would probably be antigravity, but if you do that its not a tank anymore and why not go the rest of the way and make it a gateship?
and we have seen armed military vehicals off world on sg1, in Forever in a Day we had that small malp thing with a gun on it, maybe 50 cal, and had an armor plating on the front of it but the driver did get shot off it.
so the internal stuff would be fine
Comment
-
Originally posted by freyr's motherThey aren't going to even be able to get close to the gate let alone go through it. The only way we're going to get anything that can support ground support to other worlds is by using the 304's.
Earth can do that with large ease.
Originally posted by Ludofjnjust get a APC or Warthog type vehical with a magnetic accelerator cannon, a few tow missles ,and a nice small fusion reactor with a explosive yield of what 4 Tzar bombs, and one extremely strong energy shield
Originally posted by OuroborosIf I was going to scratch build something I'd just load it up with .30 cal machine guns and maybe a single .50.
Give it computer targeting assistance on all weapons with air and ground attack modes.
Dedicated anti-air weapons aren't necessary against the lame ass aircraft the badguys field and neither are heavy anti-tank weapons. A good computer that can lead a dart or deathglider properly with a .50cal is all that's needed and it doesn't take away space from anti infantry weaponry which is what will see the most use.
At least a good railgun could achieve that. But the point of a railgun is that the vehicle should be "fixed" before firing. A smaller caliber could be fired with more ease, but wouldn't be enough against half the ships SG troops are ought to face.
So it seems that a good dozen of TOW missiles and one anti infantry gun would be perfectly good, could be used while in movement, and leave enough room for other structures.
But seriously, bring us a damn shield! There's the room for a naqahdah generator, and a miniaturized shield tech DOES exist.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FallenAngelIITanks are slow and big almost stationary targets. When was the last time you were able to surprise attack anyone using tanks?
I would bet that it is only for budgetary reasons that neither show has made use of armored vehicles as of yet...it has got to be painfully expensive renting a tank for even a few hours of filming...and that's if there are even vehicles available to rentLast edited by alaskannut; 30 September 2006, 02:39 PM.sigpic
Eagles may soar free and proud, but weasels never get sucked into jet engines.
"We're not going to Guam are we?"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ludofjnjust get a APC or Warthog type vehical with a magnetic accelerator cannon, a few tow missles ,and a nice small fusion reactor with a explosive yield of what 4 Tzar bombs, and one extremely strong energy shield
Best Stargate quote:
Sheppard: (yells to McKay) Canadian football is a joke! Celine Dion is overrated! Zelenka is smarter than you are!
Green is your friend.
Comment
-
Hey everyone - nice discussion.
When it comes to small tanks - how about this little fellow here:
I know it's not from US military but I believe S.G.C. is now mostly funded by all nations.
height: 1900mm
width: 1820mm
length: 3769mm (doesnt matter that much though)
It's highly manouvarable and quick in almost every terrain and can even be dropped from the sky (don't know the english word for this).
It can be equipped with stingers - so It's at least one option I'd say and should be considered for rescue missions and so on.
What do you say?Welcome to the zone where normal things don't happen...
...very often
Comment
-
Originally posted by ActionhankIt's highly manouvarable and quick in almost every terrain and can even be dropped from the sky (don't know the english word for this).
Best Stargate quote:
Sheppard: (yells to McKay) Canadian football is a joke! Celine Dion is overrated! Zelenka is smarter than you are!
Green is your friend.
Comment
Comment