You offend everyone
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X-304?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
I made the last on topic post here, it's your turn, that's how it works.
EDIT: Here, I'll repost:
There are three subclasses of Los Angeles class submarine, all of them are Los Angeles-x class.
Daedalus is not a subclass/variation of 303 since subclasses are part of the same class as the parent with a Roman numeral designating which order subclass they belong to. It is a new class completely, as is denoted by it's new class name [a contention assisted by its patently distinct design].
I don't even think it's 304 anymore because that would mean a departure from the naval scheme, but it is not 303.Lord §okar, Niles, Mark VI, etc: Dom Howard fan
Tama, Bosphorus, Istanbul Mehmet, Sabian, Zildjian and Remo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lord §okarI made the last on topic post here, it's your turn, that's how it works.
EDIT: Here, I'll repost:
Regardless of what *******ized (evidently the "b" word is disallowed) Air Force nomenclature system was employed with the 303 it is irrelevant, they're reverted to full naval for the Daedalus and it is a Daedalus class ship, nothing to do with 303.
I don't even think it's 304 anymore because that would mean a departure from the naval scheme, but it is not 303.
Comment
-
I'm coming to this discussion late, I know, and I've only read as far back as page 4, but I do think I have an insightful, nay, paradigm-shifting observation.
What if the Deadalus isn't an X-303. What if it's a Y-303?
Or, it's a Flight II model, which is a US Navy term for when a class is significantly redesigned, yet still retains the class name.
On a side note, the USS Los Angeles was brought up, specifically the 688 on it's sail. That number is there because it was the 688th submarine in the US Navy. That kind of numbering is irrelevant of class, the numbers keep rising for every new ship of the general type. (With the screwy exception of the three ships in the Seawolf class. The Virgina Class is catching up again at 774.)
In which case, with or without an X-, Y-, F-, BC-, -303, -304, -TBD-, or -WTF- designation, the Deadalus is using the naval numbering scheme, with it's 02 denoting it as the Earth's second battlecruiser (Which would properly be CC, according to wikipedia.)
a time to mourn
Comment
-
Or maybe you all miss the point and they are naming SPACE CRAFT!!! They can invent a whole new system for thatI'm a TrustNo1/Weir shipper Also TrustNo1/Carter shipper and TrustNo1/Teyla Shipper. In fact I'm a TrustNo1/Weir/Carter/Teyla shipper. Yes, that would be good Throw in some Vala in tight leather. Is this sig PG? Oh well
Thank you L-JADE for the sig, it ROCKS!!!
Waiting for my posts to be approved.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hatcheter(Which would properly be CC, according to wikipedia.)sigpic
Eagles may soar free and proud, but weasels never get sucked into jet engines.
"We're not going to Guam are we?"
Comment
-
Originally posted by alaskannutActually, as per the Alaska class built during WW2,the proper designation is CB...but let's not turn this thread into that kind of an argument....its been done to death
And, seriously, could it drag this thread down any more?
a time to mourn
Comment
Comment