How would y'all feel if it had been Woolsey aboard the Destiny instead of Camille Wray?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ioa
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by garhkal View PostWell for one, i feel he would have worked more closely With the scientists like he did on Atlantis than Wray did.. I also feel he would NOT have led that revolt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tomaso88 View PostI actually think there would have been much more conflict between him and Young, since after leaving rush on the planet, Woosley would have been extremely direct about it like he always is and would have demanded young step down regardless of chain of command
Comment
-
Originally posted by garhkal View PostI honestly wonder. Has anyone seen a fan fic where that was actually DONE? And if so, was rush right in the 'explosion followed through to earth'??
But there are stories (or at least one story) who tells Rush made that completely up and plainly lied about it, written by a hard core Young fan. I don't know about others, I stopped reading those stories. Other stories, which were written by (more) Rush (than Young) fans (often they come out more equal to both sides, actually) tend to tell a story, were he didn't lie to O'Neill, or told at least half way the truth.
I, myself think the writers left that point (among others) deliberately open to give each side of fans what they liked more, and tend to keep the point open.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bhousden View PostHow would y'all feel if it had been Woolsey aboard the Destiny instead of Camille Wray?
But aside from I cannot see Camile Wray as a real fail between those men. She's very unsure in the beginning and subordinates herself to Young, but less to Rush, who seemed more equal to her. Though with time she knows both men better and starts at some point to become a good mediator between the soldiers and the civilians.
Comment
Comment