You have missed the point. Books etc, may add to the story AFTER THE FACT if viewers are inclined to pursue them. JM's blog is an excellent example. There is nothing in his blog, nor has there ever been, that is necessary to the enjoyment of the show. More that 99% of viewers have never read it, nor even heard of it.
Using one's brain has nothing to do with it. There are many thought-provoking shows that require a great deal of brain usage. Take Doctor Who for example. You have to watch very closely and make connections - somewhat like Easter eggs - to upcoming stories. You do not, however, have to go anywhere else BUT the show for the information.
Several times folks here have pointed out that it is not the idea of a transmedia program that is problematic. It is the concept that the casual viewer is not going to enjoy the show and will therefore tune out. This is not good for SciFi as a network. You apparently think that if someone disagrees with you that they are complaining. Please learn the difference between honest critique and complaining, <Snipped by Moderator>
Using one's brain has nothing to do with it. There are many thought-provoking shows that require a great deal of brain usage. Take Doctor Who for example. You have to watch very closely and make connections - somewhat like Easter eggs - to upcoming stories. You do not, however, have to go anywhere else BUT the show for the information.
Several times folks here have pointed out that it is not the idea of a transmedia program that is problematic. It is the concept that the casual viewer is not going to enjoy the show and will therefore tune out. This is not good for SciFi as a network. You apparently think that if someone disagrees with you that they are complaining. Please learn the difference between honest critique and complaining, <Snipped by Moderator>
Comment