Okay, so whilst I'm hoping the writers of Terra Nova actually get to tell the whole story, I doubt they will. Far too many shows as of late end up prematurely cancelled, mainly because they lack the viewers that make it feasible to continue producing the show in question.
This happened with Caprica, Farscape, Heroes, and Stargate Universe for the more common shows here, along with others such as the Cape, the Event, and Outcasts. I'm sure several more shows will follow suit as time goes on, it's to be expected.
Anyway, I was thinking earlier about the events of Terra Nova, specifically everything we know thus far. Granted we don't know a huge amount, but I think we know enough to make some sort of wild guess as to the end game of the show. Now, what do we know?
We know that a probe was sent back in time so that it could be located in the present/future - this seems to be their attempt at finding out whether the past and the future were of the same timeline.
We are told that Terra Nova (and the Terra Nova past) is on a parallel timeline, that would co-exist with the one from which the came from. Thus, the future and the new future can exist together, without overwriting each other. This is where my theory comes to light. I don't believe the timelines are different at all, I believe them to be exactly the same one.
Firstly, the probe. They sent it back 65 Million years ago; did they really expect to find it? Anything could have happened in that time. It would have sunk to the bottom of the ocean, it could have melted in a Volcano, it could have been destroyed in a Rock/landslide, or it could have been eaten by a really large Dinosaur (okay unlikely, but humour me). If they're using the probe as proof that the past is a different timeline to the future, then they should have thought about results little more before they sent the thing.
Secondly, if the two timelines are linked, then something must happen to our new colony at some point in time, thus nobody finding out about it in the future. I'm thinking well outside the box, but we know that there is a cataclysmic event at some point in the past that wipes out many of the Dinosaurs, and decimates the surface of the planet. What if it wasn't a meteorite at all, but rather a human-scientific / military experiment gone terribly wrong.
Think, Terra Nova is only the start, they've got thousands of years yet, and if they're high on population control, they're never going to conquer the world. A group of people get together to create a new energy source or something, everything goes wrong, they take half the planet with them in the resulting explosion. Either the future-humans would still evolve as they normally would, or a few survivors manage to keep the population going, thus explaining the 'missing link' in the process.
But yeah, that's all I've got, I think it adds up. My brain hurts a little at the moment, but I do believe my little theory could work. Would be a little lame I suppose, in that there would be no hope for humanity (unless they managed to sort the atmosphere out in the future) but from the perspective of 2149 and 65million BC, it's only ever an everlasting loop.
Thoughts?
This happened with Caprica, Farscape, Heroes, and Stargate Universe for the more common shows here, along with others such as the Cape, the Event, and Outcasts. I'm sure several more shows will follow suit as time goes on, it's to be expected.
Anyway, I was thinking earlier about the events of Terra Nova, specifically everything we know thus far. Granted we don't know a huge amount, but I think we know enough to make some sort of wild guess as to the end game of the show. Now, what do we know?
We know that a probe was sent back in time so that it could be located in the present/future - this seems to be their attempt at finding out whether the past and the future were of the same timeline.
We are told that Terra Nova (and the Terra Nova past) is on a parallel timeline, that would co-exist with the one from which the came from. Thus, the future and the new future can exist together, without overwriting each other. This is where my theory comes to light. I don't believe the timelines are different at all, I believe them to be exactly the same one.
Firstly, the probe. They sent it back 65 Million years ago; did they really expect to find it? Anything could have happened in that time. It would have sunk to the bottom of the ocean, it could have melted in a Volcano, it could have been destroyed in a Rock/landslide, or it could have been eaten by a really large Dinosaur (okay unlikely, but humour me). If they're using the probe as proof that the past is a different timeline to the future, then they should have thought about results little more before they sent the thing.
Secondly, if the two timelines are linked, then something must happen to our new colony at some point in time, thus nobody finding out about it in the future. I'm thinking well outside the box, but we know that there is a cataclysmic event at some point in the past that wipes out many of the Dinosaurs, and decimates the surface of the planet. What if it wasn't a meteorite at all, but rather a human-scientific / military experiment gone terribly wrong.
Think, Terra Nova is only the start, they've got thousands of years yet, and if they're high on population control, they're never going to conquer the world. A group of people get together to create a new energy source or something, everything goes wrong, they take half the planet with them in the resulting explosion. Either the future-humans would still evolve as they normally would, or a few survivors manage to keep the population going, thus explaining the 'missing link' in the process.
But yeah, that's all I've got, I think it adds up. My brain hurts a little at the moment, but I do believe my little theory could work. Would be a little lame I suppose, in that there would be no hope for humanity (unless they managed to sort the atmosphere out in the future) but from the perspective of 2149 and 65million BC, it's only ever an everlasting loop.
Thoughts?
Comment