MGM has finally been bought out, now its only a matter of time before we get the third SG-1 film and the SGA film........ i would assume, thoughts?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Good times!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by captain simms View PostMGM has finally been bought out, now its only a matter of time before we get the third SG-1 film and the SGA film........ i would assume, thoughts?
Comment
-
Originally posted by captain simms View PostMGM has finally been bought out, now its only a matter of time before we get the third SG-1 film and the SGA film........ i would assume, thoughts?
Comment
-
This is from the on-line site of British newspaper, The Daily Express:
"A controlling five per cent stake will be held by the its new management, small rival Spyglass Entertainment – producers of the Sixth Sense – who plan to raise financing to produce between four and six new movies a year, including the Bond and Hobbit films, prequels to The Lord Of The Rings trilogy. Movie experts are relieved by news of the deal. “It’s fantastic that MGM is not going to disappear, and hopefully this means that the next Bond will now be made,†says Allan Hunter, Daily Express chief film critic."
Four to six mainstream movies does not sound encouraging for the prospects of Stargate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tallifer View PostThis is from the on-line site of British newspaper, The Daily Express:
"A controlling five per cent stake will be held by the its new management, small rival Spyglass Entertainment – producers of the Sixth Sense – who plan to raise financing to produce between four and six new movies a year, including the Bond and Hobbit films, prequels to The Lord Of The Rings trilogy. Movie experts are relieved by news of the deal. “It’s fantastic that MGM is not going to disappear, and hopefully this means that the next Bond will now be made,†says Allan Hunter, Daily Express chief film critic."
Four to six mainstream movies does not sound encouraging for the prospects of Stargate.sigpic
The best written female character on trek ever.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chrono trigger View Postwhy do you think thats bad?
I bet Spyglass haven't even spoken about Stargate. It is all about Bond and the Hobbit.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Phenom View PostBecause they are just doing the big movies and nothing to do with Stargate, which is pretty much getting lost in the enormous MGM library.
I bet Spyglass haven't even spoken about Stargate. It is all about Bond and the Hobbit.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Phenom View PostSource?
Unless the quote in the post a few above was a complete fabrication then your statement can't be true.
A proposal to put Spyglass toppers' Gary Barber and Roger Birnbaum in charge of MGM pushed ahead Wednesday as their plan for restoring the Lion's roar was presented to all of the studio's debtors during a conference call.
Barber and Birnbaum have been holding discussions with MGM's leading creditors, which include Anchorage Advisors and Highland Capital. Wednesday's conference call looped in more than 100 creditors, who must endorse the plan.
Those knowledgeable with the talks say Birnbaum and Barber would take over after MGM goes through a pre-packaged bankruptcy. The creditors would absolve much of the studio's $4 billion in debt and take a majority equity stake in the company, along with providing a certain amount of working capital.
A major component of the plan would likely include shuttering MGM's distribution operation, which would reduce overhead substantially. Instead, Birnbaum and Barber would strike a theatrical distribution deal with another major.
A leading candidate is Paramount, with whom the duo have formed a close relationship, partnering on the rebooted "Star Trek" franchise, "G.I. Joe: Rise of the Cobra" and "Dinner for Schmucks," according to insiders.(Daily Variety, Aug. 13).
MGM also would move aggressively into television.
True or not, the status of those movies has zero bearing on Stargate. Projects aren't funded using a single pot of cash held by the studio.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KEK View PostWhy can't it? Anyway, it wasn't actually a quote, just an article:
http://www.variety.com/article/VR111...goryid=13&cs=1
True or not, the status of those movies has zero bearing on Stargate. Projects aren't funded using a single pot of cash held by the studio.
I hope you are right. I guess it is all speculation and the only ones who actually know what will happen are those who were in those meetings.sigpic
Comment
Comment