I've been wondering about a few things in Continuum. I have gathered that, for whatever reason, when someone goes back in time and alters the timeline that they came from, they are not affected by this. This is evident when Mitchell goes back and undoes the timeline he came from (although that might not count, since he was never born in that timeline. He came froom the first) and when Ba'al undoes the timeline he came from without dissapearing because that's the whole plot of the movie. But is the Ba'al from the fixed timeline at the end of the movie who is implied to have gone back in time (since the fixed timeline is basically the same as the original one, we can assume that the captured Ba'al clone again warned SG-1 of his plan) the same Ba'al who Mitchell kills to fix the timeline? Because, if so, that would be the biggest, and hardest to explain, paradox in Stargate yet. And if not, who killed the most most recent Ba'al to go back in time in the fixed timeline?
P.S. That whole 'witnessing the timeline shift' concept still gives me a headache.
P.S. That whole 'witnessing the timeline shift' concept still gives me a headache.
Comment