When I was at the Van Con a few weeks ago, I asked Martin Gero if they would be expanding on Sheppard's use of his gene. He said the writers have decided "not to pursue that mythology anymore." I was surprised but we weren't able to finish the conversation.
When fans complain about SGA repeating story plots from SG1, Star Trek, the writers say it's hard to find new and different stories with so much already written out there. They say they write for how SGA responds to those story plots. Which in my mind is okay I guess, to a point.
In the pilot, 'Rising', wasn't a big deal made of Sheppard having the gene, "the likes we've never seen before", (Weir)? And haven't there been a few episodes where friend/foe have pursued "the one with the gene", (Wraith/Larrin,etc.)?
I feel the writers are missing an opportuniy here. Look at 'Baal' and the 'Ori'. Sheppard could end up being 'the answer', not just a one dimensional character. Anyone agree? And if so, how do we get our message across?
K.
When fans complain about SGA repeating story plots from SG1, Star Trek, the writers say it's hard to find new and different stories with so much already written out there. They say they write for how SGA responds to those story plots. Which in my mind is okay I guess, to a point.
In the pilot, 'Rising', wasn't a big deal made of Sheppard having the gene, "the likes we've never seen before", (Weir)? And haven't there been a few episodes where friend/foe have pursued "the one with the gene", (Wraith/Larrin,etc.)?
I feel the writers are missing an opportuniy here. Look at 'Baal' and the 'Ori'. Sheppard could end up being 'the answer', not just a one dimensional character. Anyone agree? And if so, how do we get our message across?
K.
Comment