Originally posted by jelgate
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Enough with the technobabble already!! Not that the SG writers can do any better...
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Lythisrose View PostIf I didn't like the technobabbly stuff at least a little I wouldn't be watching SciFi and SGA in the first place. I'd be off to the soap opera station (if there is one).Last edited by jelgate; 08 January 2008, 10:02 PM.Originally posted by aretood2Jelgate is right
Comment
-
Atlantis has been about technology from day one. Rodney has spoken plenty of techobabble from the moment he was introduced as a character on SG-1. Frankly, given those two things technobabble is to be expected. What was said in BAMSR was not complicated in any way, IMO. I'm don't claim to be any kind of scientist, but I had no trouble understanding what was going on.
If you don't like it, go watch something else.I'm not an actor. I just play one on TV.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Avenger View PostAtlantis has been about technology from day one. Rodney has spoken plenty of techobabble from the moment he was introduced as a character on SG-1. Frankly, given those two things technobabble is to be expected. What was said in BAMSR was not complicated in any way, IMO. I'm don't claim to be any kind of scientist, but I had no trouble understanding what was going on.
If you don't like it, go watch something else.
Comment
-
I didn't expect anything other than a love in in this total wankfest of a Stargate forum but hey.
Originally posted by PG15 View PostBut surely you don't expect the show to stay stagnant in its technology?
Originally posted by kymeric View PostDont watch reruns of startrek the next generation, youll have a seizure then. There its always tech something tachyon other. Its a staple of the scifi genre, and its not like its a new thing. Maybe they should replace it with BSG style sex and hallucinating presidents?
My problem with the technobabble is that you don't need it to tell a good story. BSG doesn't have any for instance. Again, it's all down to lazy writing, with writers who can't do any better than a) come up with far-fetched theories to offset their own inadequacies and b) introduce "kewl" new tech every week, conveniently plot holled for that particular episode but then forgotten about.
Comment
-
This "technobable" is present in many SF shows/movies. The problems come when the technobabble becomes too convenient and predictable. Please don't throw rocks at me, but I prefer Startrek's technobabble to the one in SGA.
SG1 is not free of convenient technobabble : at some point it became truly boring that Sam repaired ships,shields,anything with the same identical,old technique "switch colourful crystals" .
The most irritating thing about SGA's technobabble is that the items/technologies very rarely appear again in future episodes.
Also, I dislike the lack of consistency : the humans are supposed to have limited knowledge about the advanced lantean technology. Yet, every time McKay is able to magically use or make it work . Always in the last minute . But it will work only once : the device is destroyed, stolen, or labeled "too dangerous to be used again" .
The most recent example: they've managed to create Fran - a fully functional , well programmed for her purpose , stable and trusted replicator !
From now on it is possible to have such a new replicator built in every season for accomplishing different tasks. But this will never happen : it will be "too dangerous" to use the nanites building table again, even if the whole plan of "be all my sins remembered" depended on the ability to trust Fran !
The writers are denying us countless of interesting plots by limiting the newly found devices/tehnologies to only one occurence .
Comment
-
Originally posted by HyperspaceDaemon View PostThis "technobable" is present in many SF shows/movies. The problems come when the technobabble becomes too convenient and predictable. Please don't throw rocks at me, but I prefer Startrek's technobabble to the one in SGA.
SG1 is not free of convenient technobabble : at some point it became truly boring that Sam repaired ships,shields,anything with the same identical,old technique "switch colourful crystals" .
The most irritating thing about SGA's technobabble is that the items/technologies very rarely appear again in future episodes.
Also, I dislike the lack of consistency : the humans are supposed to have limited knowledge about the advanced lantean technology. Yet, every time McKay is able to magically use or make it work . Always in the last minute . But it will work only once : the device is destroyed, stolen, or labeled "too dangerous to be used again" .
The most recent example: they've managed to create Fran - a fully functional , well programmed for her purpose , stable and trusted replicator !
From now on it is possible to have such a new replicator built in every season for accomplishing different tasks. But this will never happen : it will be "too dangerous" to use the nanites building table again, even if the whole plan of "be all my sins remembered" depended on the ability to trust Fran !
The writers are denying us countless of interesting plots by limiting the newly found devices/tehnologies to only one occurence .
Until the next episode comes around and another new gizmo is discovered used.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stevearm07 View PostExactly right. Again it's showing their ineptitude at good storytelling, to have this wonderful new tech delivered to our door conveniently just in time for the episode it's most needed... then disappear forever.
Until the next episode comes around and another new gizmo is discovered used.
Comment
-
Techonobabble is part of sci-fi in general. I understand technobabble (nearly always ) and what rodney wanted to do and said amkes perfect sense, and was an ingenious plan. Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean its rubbish. Technobabble is good in (futuristic)sci-fi because our physics doesn't work like that.
I didn't expect anything other than a love in in this total wankfest of a Stargate forum but hey.
Joe Mallozzi: "Like my grandmother used to say: Whenever a gate closes, a hyperspace window opens…"
Comment
-
Originally posted by jenks View PostWhy is it that the new technology is most needed now? We found out about the Asurans wiping out human worlds in the Seer.
The 'beam weapons' that can destroy a ship in seconds was the last straw for me. Although later that same episode we were treated to the 'Replicator-maker'. I wonder what tech will be introduced next week...
Originally posted by beale947 View PostWhat were you expecting? It's a stargate forum or did you not understand this simple thing either. It would explain alot about this thread and you're opinions.
This forum, is filled with people who would never say a bad word about the show, and look to make excuses for the writers and producers at every opportunity. Although given how ratings have plummetted, I wouldn't be surprised if the people on here are the only SG fans left.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stevearm07 View PostOk, I enjoyed Be All My Sins Remember'd. It was an action packed episode with lots of explosions and I enjoy those. Fine, but that's about it.
I am however getting F-ING SICK AND TIRED of the amount of technobabble every single week on Atlantis. It seems to be getting worse and worse these past two years from episode to episode.
The amount of deus ex machina and wonderful Ancient tech mixed in with corny convenient plot elements was getting ridiculous by the end of the episode. It was laughable. In fact a friend of mine who's into SG but not hugely serious about it just ended up laughing by the end at just how much of a joke the "WRITING" was.
Of course I know the reason for all this. The Stargate writers can't write a clever well thought out plot, simple as that. To them,
a good episode = explosions + a 'dramatic' twist + lots of technobabble + last second beam out by an Earth ship.
Which is fine, Stargate is a bit of a superficial 'fun' show and that's cool, but regardless... please, writers.. use your brains for once instead of having McKay come up with his latest 'plan' or 'Ancient technology' every week.
I completely agree with you. Writing is getting worse and worse. But it's SG-1's problem too. Have you seen AoT? Another miracolous device which saves us allStolen Kosovo
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by stevearm07 View PostIs that supposed to be an argument against the lazy writing and the fact that miraculous wonderful tech seems to appear every episode?
The 'beam weapons' that can destroy a ship in seconds was the last straw for me. Although later that same episode we were treated to the 'Replicator-maker'. I wonder what tech will be introduced next week...
Steve, you write a stargate series then. All this complaining about the writers is not needed as you couldn't do much better.
Most forums can be objective, with fans realising when the quality dips or when things about the show just aren't right.
This forum, is filled with people who would never say a bad word about the show, and look to make excuses for the writers and producers at every opportunity. Although given how ratings have plummetted, I wouldn't be surprised if the people on here are the only SG fans left.Last edited by beale947; 09 January 2008, 03:14 AM.
Joe Mallozzi: "Like my grandmother used to say: Whenever a gate closes, a hyperspace window opens…"
Comment
-
Originally posted by stevearm07 View PostIs that supposed to be an argument against the lazy writing and the fact that miraculous wonderful tech seems to appear every episode?
The 'beam weapons' that can destroy a ship in seconds was the last straw for me. Although later that same episode we were treated to the 'Replicator-maker'. I wonder what tech will be introduced next week...
Most forums can be objective, with fans realising when the quality dips or when things about the show just aren't right.
This forum, is filled with people who would never say a bad word about the show, and look to make excuses for the writers and producers at every opportunity. Although given how ratings have plummetted, I wouldn't be surprised if the people on here are the only SG fans left.
Comment
-
Originally posted by g.o.d View PostI completely agree with you. Writing is getting worse and worse. But it's SG-1's problem too. Have you seen AoT? Another miracolous device which saves us all
Originally posted by beale947 View PostThese were brought in in SG-1's 'Unending'. They were used then to destroy an Ori ship, are you complaining about that as well???
Originally posted by beale947 View PostAll this complaining about the writers is not needed as you couldn't do much better.
Originally posted by jenks View PostNo I was pointing out the flaws in your argument.
Originally posted by jenks View PostIt would have been more retarded had we not got them after the events of Unending.
Originally posted by jenks View PostHow can you be objective about something that entirely subjective? I for one think this is by far the best season of Atlantis, far more character development, drama and action and far less cheese.
Originally posted by jenks View PostYou obviously haven't been reading very carefully, this forum is filled with people who having nothing but bad things to say about the show. There seems to be a hell of a lot of people like you on these forums actually, highlighting problems in the show that have existed in every season of the show, and have been a hell of a lot more prominent too. Unsurprisingly 9 out of 10 of them seem to be Weir or Beckett fans, coincidence? I think not.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stevearm07 View PostI groaned when they mentioned the new "super kewl" Asguard beam weapons that conveniently turn up the episode they're required and can destroy a replicator ship with a few shots.
Then there was the de-Wraith poison, the anti-Replicator 'forcefield', the hyperdrived Puddle jumper, the replicator maker/workstation, the underwater power-station etc etc etc...
All convenient episodic deux ex machinas that the writers think can make up for their inept ability to tell a good story without having the Daedalus beam the team up at the last second, or yet another 'allience with the enemy' or 'hunt for the incredible Ancient weapon'.
The Wraith retrovirus definitely isn't. Scientifically suspect, sure, but it's no deus ex machina.
I'm fairly certain that Rodney mentioned that he had figured out how to give a Jumper a hyperdrive back in "Tao of Rodney". They needed it in "Adrift/Lifeline", so they went back to it.
The Replicator builder was a little convenient, sure, and hasn't been mentioned, but it makes total sense that it would exist.
And that underwater energy platform had an entire episode about them finding and exploring it...
Originally posted by stevearm07 View PostI didn't expect anything other than a love in in this total wankfest of a Stargate forum but hey.
Originally posted by stevearm07 View PostOh please. This forum is filled with gushers like PG15 and yourself.
Comment
Comment