Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Does anyone else have trouble relating to any of the main characters?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Arawn
    replied
    I actually like most of the characters in SGU. I can relate to Greer somewhat and Rush, ironically enough. The scene where Rush and Greer have a mini-standoff with Rush talking about the dock workers in Glasgow felt very real, the idea being that Greer sees all the SGC personnel as entitled spoiled weaklings whereas Rush still sees himself as working class despite his obvious advantages of income because he earned it. Greer's character development through the two seasons is excellent. Rush also develops, learning to trust people a bit more (how authentic this is I don't know, but he does a good job of pretending if that's what he's doing).

    Leave a comment:


  • kapa1611
    replied
    I couldn't agree more, in SG-1 and Atlantis we had McKay, Carter, and Daniel as our resident "science nerds"; those characters were much more heroic and aspirational for a viewer. I want to think of nerds as heroic alien fighters, not friendzoned kids caught in the wrong place at the wrong time.
    great point! McKay, Sam and Daniel were much better "nerds".

    i always hated the dark tone of SGU, but the second thing that bothered me about that show, was the cynisism of the showrunners.

    they made Eli a caricature of a nerd (they literally pick him because of his video game skills......) and they made the cast young (they made fun of that in the episode "200"). it shows contempt for the audience when you do that, but they didn't seem to care about that.

    it's funny that the most popular character in SGU was still the old guy (Rush) xD there is some justice in that: their cynical view of what the audience likes didn't turn out to be true.. (even tho personally i never liked Rush.. he didn't feel like a scientist. scientists irl and in SG1 and SGA have a sense of wonderment and are usually not creepie xD Carter, McKay, Zelenka and Lee are much better characters, imo)
    Last edited by kapa1611; 13 September 2021, 10:29 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • rgritt
    replied
    Originally posted by kapa1611 View Post
    i felt the same way about all the SGU characters.

    part of the reason why it's hard to relate to Eli is probably because his character was a blatant attempt by the showrunners to pander to scifi nerds. so there is always this underlying cynicism there, that people in the audience noticed, i think.
    but generally why it's hard to like anybody in SGU is because the show is dreary and miserable. there is no sense of camradery and togetherness among the crew and the point of the show isn't adventure or discovery, but survival (clinging to life to survive is miserable.. finding wonderment, friendship and adventures in life is meaningful)

    in the first season of SGA there was a similar issue with the Atlantis cast. there was ego-clashes between Shepherd and Weir (for example in the episode where Shepherd refused to isolate, and instead demanded to go to the control room, in violation of Weir's orders. it was an ego-off, that really rubbed me the wrong way) and there was also the antagonistic military generals (in the pilot there was the guy who Shepherd shot to save him from the Wraith queen, and in the finale there was the general that took over Atlantis without showing any respect for the people at Atlantis, especially Weir). so there wasn't a sense that everybody is pulling in the same direction (which was never an issue with SG1, we always knew that SG1 was a great team, and Hammond was always on their side as well)
    so SGU was just a terrible show altogether, full of moapie, detached unlikable people that barely anybody can relate to. and when the show is dark and miserable, and the characters are unlikable, moapie, selfobsessed and emotionally detached, then nobody wants to be with these people or be on that ship. which leads people to not want to watch the show.

    i like to say that SG shows last 2 seasons longer than they should have: SG1 S9 and 10 were a bit farcial on occasion.. SGA S 4 and 5 became dark and desaturated and less engaging and fun as a result. and SGU should never have existed xD
    I couldn't agree more, in SG-1 and Atlantis we had McKay, Carter, and Daniel as our resident "science nerds"; those characters were much more heroic and aspirational for a viewer. I want to think of nerds as heroic alien fighters, not friendzoned kids caught in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    Leave a comment:


  • kapa1611
    replied
    i felt the same way about all the SGU characters.

    part of the reason why it's hard to relate to Eli is probably because his character was a blatant attempt by the showrunners to pander to scifi nerds. so there is always this underlying cynicism there, that people in the audience noticed, i think.
    but generally why it's hard to like anybody in SGU is because the show is dreary and miserable. there is no sense of camradery and togetherness among the crew and the point of the show isn't adventure or discovery, but survival (clinging to life to survive is miserable.. finding wonderment, friendship and adventures in life is meaningful)

    in the first season of SGA there was a similar issue with the Atlantis cast. there was ego-clashes between Shepherd and Weir (for example in the episode where Shepherd refused to isolate, and instead demanded to go to the control room, in violation of Weir's orders. it was an ego-off, that really rubbed me the wrong way) and there was also the antagonistic military generals (in the pilot there was the guy who Shepherd shot to save him from the Wraith queen, and in the finale there was the general that took over Atlantis without showing any respect for the people at Atlantis, especially Weir). so there wasn't a sense that everybody is pulling in the same direction (which was never an issue with SG1, we always knew that SG1 was a great team, and Hammond was always on their side as well)
    so SGU was just a terrible show altogether, full of moapie, detached unlikable people that barely anybody can relate to. and when the show is dark and miserable, and the characters are unlikable, moapie, selfobsessed and emotionally detached, then nobody wants to be with these people or be on that ship. which leads people to not want to watch the show.

    i like to say that SG shows last 2 seasons longer than they should have: SG1 S9 and 10 were a bit farcial on occasion.. SGA S 4 and 5 became dark and desaturated and less engaging and fun as a result. and SGU should never have existed xD

    Leave a comment:


  • Chaka-Z0
    replied
    Originally posted by donald85 View Post
    No main character cuts it.
    Perhaps Brody comes close.

    Greer is the worst, worst than the senator (Chloe's father) and should have died on 1st episode imho. Way too volatile. Colonel Young is too aggressive, Scott is too submitted and trying to be bossy. TJ is too confused.

    Civil side, Rush is a monster, a mastermind turned bad. Eli is a kid with no maturity barely getting it together by the end, also volatile. Camille is disgustingly greedy for power. Chloe is clueless borderline neurotic.

    None of these people should have been anywhere near a top secret science facility on another planet, not even for any inauguration. So the story of them being caught on Icarus and later stuck on Destiny is just not believable.

    The series would have been so much more interesting with calm and clever people, not a bunch of panic-driven volatile screamers. Over the top drama.

    --

    In case you wonder, I liked the concept, the intrigue, the stories, the soundtrack, the scenes, decor, ambience...

    but none of the characters, except "the ship".
    Yes, because you'd keep your cool and stay calm if you got gated against your will to butt-fk nowhere on the other side of the universe, stuck on an unstoppable ship with little food, water and air & being constantly attacked by hostiles.

    Leave a comment:


  • donald85
    replied
    No main character cuts it.
    Perhaps Brody comes close.

    Greer is the worst, worst than the senator (Chloe's father) and should have died on 1st episode imho. Way too volatile. Colonel Young is too aggressive, Scott is too submitted and trying to be bossy. TJ is too confused.

    Civil side, Rush is a monster, a mastermind turned bad. Eli is a kid with no maturity barely getting it together by the end, also volatile. Camille is disgustingly greedy for power. Chloe is clueless borderline neurotic.

    None of these people should have been anywhere near a top secret science facility on another planet, not even for any inauguration. So the story of them being caught on Icarus and later stuck on Destiny is just not believable.

    The series would have been so much more interesting with calm and clever people, not a bunch of panic-driven volatile screamers. Over the top drama.

    --

    In case you wonder, I liked the concept, the intrigue, the stories, the soundtrack, the scenes, decor, ambience...

    but none of the characters, except "the ship".

    Leave a comment:


  • Shiner833
    replied
    I think Scott, to me, was a very realistic character. He was a young military officer still learning how to command. However, he also had relationships/friendships with both military and civilian characters and sometimes had to choose sides. I would get really excited when Greer would go all badass on people though. Especially with the Lucian Alliance. That was epic and reminds me of some of my military buddies that I've served with. I'll agree that instead of relating sometimes I look for traits in people that I admire that maybe I would like to be more like. Sometimes you see some you're glad you don't have.

    Leave a comment:


  • Novus
    replied
    I would relate to Nicholas Rush, Eli Wallace and Adam Brody.

    Leave a comment:


  • jackfloyd1973
    replied
    Originally posted by mi_guard View Post
    I do not really need to relate to someone while watching a show, but I had no problem relating to the majority of the SGU characters. there was just one annoying me every time I saw him. do not even remember his name, but he got his nose broken by Vanessa James in one of the last episodes
    that was really hilarious, then tj had an amused look, of course the idiot was askin' for it.

    Leave a comment:


  • TuKwick_1
    replied
    Originally posted by Pizerer View Post
    I don't think I've really related to Eli at all this season. I was surprised though since eli is an overweight geek/nerd like myself. Still, I can't seem to relate to this guy.

    Anyone else thought about this?
    I can relate to Eli, I am a touch overweight and a huge nerd/geek, but I can't relate to his life situation

    Originally posted by Pharaoh Atem View Post
    Rush- i can relate with wanting to be a loner.

    greer- i can relate with his anger and doing what needs to be done in situations even if it seems extreme (divided)
    I do things that get the job done even if it means being alienated or losing a friend or two.

    I like to be alone, theirs no one to mess things up.....

    Originally posted by mere earthling View Post
    It's funny, one thing I have learned in life is to pretty much expect anything out of people. So, in watching SGU I find it entertaining.
    I would have to agree about expecting things out of people....

    Originally posted by VampyreWraith View Post
    I guess I can relate the most to Eli because hes kind of a dork and sometimes says things that no one gets. I can relate to Rush a bit because of his cynical nature. I can also kinda relate to TJ a bit because she trys to be understanding and helpful even when shes in over her head. Those three also happen to be my favorite characters.
    I often say things that most people dont get/they'n to be funny or smart..... the ding with the pie or the simulation is done....

    Always in over my head...

    Always cynical in my head but some what positive on the out, being cynical on the in is easier because the failures of team/self are easier and wins are enormous.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndSoItBegins
    replied
    Originally posted by Pizerer View Post
    I don't think I've really related to Eli at all this season. I was surprised though since eli is an overweight geek/nerd like myself. Still, I can't seem to relate to this guy.

    Anyone else thought about this?
    Since they are the closest examples of real people in the SG franchise, I can relate to just about all of them. So my answer is no.

    Leave a comment:


  • mi_guard
    replied
    I do not really need to relate to someone while watching a show, but I had no problem relating to the majority of the SGU characters. there was just one annoying me every time I saw him. do not even remember his name, but he got his nose broken by Vanessa James in one of the last episodes

    Leave a comment:


  • jackfloyd1973
    replied
    my temperament is somewhere between greer & young, i also tend to agree with greer, vanessa and even scott to a degree, and the only characteristic i have in common with rush is not being burdened with the curse of tact.

    Leave a comment:


  • Janus
    replied
    I know what you mean. The only character I feel I will never connect with is Rush. I simply dislike the man. And it's not even a good dislike - like with Gaius Baltar - just an annoyed one.

    Leave a comment:


  • Krystal
    replied
    At the beginning I have problems with that, the characters doesn't appeal to me much specially because they spend too much time trying to get into their stories without much action. The only ones I kind of like since the beginning were Rush and Eli. As the series progress TJ, Greer, Young, Camile pick my interest. The others still needs a bit of work.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X