Thanks, Jumper. I wondered why there was so little Jack and did feel quite cheated at the way his role was hyped in the promos and his actual role. It made no sense from a story POV, so unavailability makes sense.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
'Stargate: Continuum' General Discussion
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by VSS View PostHey I just saw Amazon's DVDs/BluRay total sales rankings for 2008.
Continuum was #6!sigpicThanks to Oma-1 for the beautiful banner!
Comment
-
Sorry, my last post was inaccurate. The submarine accident occurred around the same time as the filming of Continuum was but not related to it. You can see the news article here:
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.js...81474976953170
Comment
-
I don't think they died making the movie. They died on a british sub, the HMS Tireless in the artic at the same time the film wa being filmed.
Here's a wiki link with ome information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Tireless_(S88)sigpic
Banner By JME2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stan View PostJust watched this in BD HD and it looks and sounds awesome.
Length was good and well paced. Never a dull moment.
But...
It was a time travel story and it all gets reset to near zero at the end.
What a waste of time. No one is a friend; Hammond, Jack, Hayes, Landry all act like strangers...
And Ba'al...
If it was the Ba'al that died at the end; why do we assume the host is innocent and not a willing servant. Did he get his style from the goauld?
Stan
P.S. More please
Comment
-
I don't dislike the occasional time travel story. This one had some very interesting aspects, such as the moral implications of changing the timeline, as well as some really nice character monents for the whole team. It's also the only way we were able to see something of Qetesh, which was fun. Claudia Black did a wonderful Job portraying her. And being a show to which the military is willing to lend a nuclear sub? Priceless.
Comment
-
Originally posted by amconway View PostI don't dislike the occasional time travel story. This one had some very interesting aspects, such as the moral implications of changing the timeline, as well as some really nice character monents for the whole team. It's also the only way we were able to see something of Qetesh, which was fun. Claudia Black did a wonderful Job portraying her. And being a show to which the military is willing to lend a nuclear sub? Priceless.It's a dangerous business going out your front door.
--J.R.R. Tolkien
Comment
-
Catsmeow writes: [...] “And along more fannish lines… 3. In the movie Continuum, after Carter, Mitchell and Daniel wind up in the altered timeline and are separated - do you really think the three of them obeyed the proscription against contact? Or do you think before they were separated they devised some clever & subtle ways to contact each other?”
AT: I think they are brilliant enough to have devised a way to stay in contact.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jumper_One View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stan View PostSecond viewing... hate this even more... I have spent the last few days watching some Atlantis and Stargate episodes... You have all these characters SG-1, Dr. Lee, Kavanagh, Landry, Walter coming and going... Continuum is just not part of that. It all never happened. I so hope there are more non-time travel to come. Universe: in a way I will miss all of the established stuff, if they really are stuck in th middle of nowhere.
For me it was kind of frustrating to see O'Neill again but not come away knowing anything about what he's been up to for the last several years. That was a waste of precious screen time, IMHO. I bought the movie way back when but it's not going to be one I pop into the player over and over, because except for Ba'al dying, it's largely irrelevant.
Comment
-
Originally posted by silly sally View PostThankfully, what Amanda Tapping thinks is irrelevant...
Comment
Comment