Originally posted by gateraid
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Will there be another movie?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by gateraid View PostNo, the finale would have been almost identical. It was written well beforehand, with the specific intention that it was going to be in movie format and serve as the end of the series. They cut out a few scenes (Jack and Sam were supposed to kiss in the cargo ship, they were supposed to parachute out onto the ice instead of using the ring transporter...) and tweaked the ending slightly. In the movie script, they were to find Atlantis under the ice, but had to tweak it to finding the outpost instead.
Comment
-
I did.
Originally posted by gateraid View PostI actually would have been happy to have SG-1 end in The Lost City, although I might be in the minority there. If it had, I think we wouldn't be having this discussion as SG-1's format is the one that lends itself most easily to movies, which would never have happened if that series had ended back then.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snowman37 View PostI did.
It reads like you wanted the show to end with the episode and continue with movies. Can you see how it looks like that?
Originally posted by LtColCarter View PostActually, you said what he said with a few extra details...however...where did you find that information?sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by gateraid View PostJack and Sam were supposed to kiss in the cargo ship
SeaboeIf you're going to allow yourself to be offended by a cat, you might as well just pack it in -- Steven Brust
Comment
-
Originally posted by Seaboe Muffinchucker View PostI've listened to that commentary, too, more than once, and I don't believe either Amanda or Martin were serious when they referred to a kiss. From the tone of their voices and other things said around the time of this comment, it was a joke. They were deliberately teasing the shippers.
Seaboesigpic
Comment
-
Why would you ever want to have ended SG1 any earlier than they did? Yes, I am okay with the closure that it got. No sooner. SGA should have gotten some movies. Let us not forget that SG1 could have had some crossover with those movies just like the ST movie Generations did.
As far as SGU goes, it is not just the fact that it was cancelled that would cause it not to be involved, IMO, but the fan divide. If I was an executive of TPTW I would not include it in the first movie. More likely to make the first movie involving SGA and let in some SG1 crossover. I would give it some time and hope for the best in the near future after the first movie wets the taste buds for SG again. Then they can make another movie and bring in SGU. If that one succeeds then sky would be the limit. Let the prequels and sequels continue.
Due to said fan divide............this will be a long long long time coming. Who wants to risk losing more money in this economy when the fans of the franchise are asking each other to boycott this or that.
If the ST fans had been like that, all those movies would probably never been made.Posting at.............
http://godus.boards.net/
Comment
-
SGA and SGU both need movies and fast. Oh, and we did see Furling tech in one Season 6 ep.(A Furling skeleton was cut from the episode)."I have never understood why it should be necessary to become irrational in order to prove that you care... or why it should be necessary to prove it at all."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Coco Pops View PostWhat are / were the furlings? They keep getting mentioned but no one's ever seen one."I have never understood why it should be necessary to become irrational in order to prove that you care... or why it should be necessary to prove it at all."
Comment
-
This became apparent when MGM was selling an auctioning stuff off back during SGU's second season. Will there be a third SG-1 movie? No. Was there at least a story concept for a third movie? Brad Wright says as much. Perhaps we should have a discussion going on what the third movie might have been?
Comment
Comment