Originally posted by minigeek
I found the following incredibly insulting to AT/MS/CJ -- "Stargate SG-1 received a new lease on life last year, with new cast members . . . ." This implies that the show would have died without the "new cast" and that it "needed" rejuvenation and that the new cast gave the show new life - what bunk that is and I am disappointed in the article because that is a huge slap to the BIG 3. The show in S8 was heads and tails above S9 and S9, mostly, IMO due to the very poorly written and introduced "new characters" has proven nothing but damaging, including in the ratings, and and has just furthered the damage to the credibility (what is left of it) of the people in charge of this show. If they had not messed with the formula my $$$ is on S9 having done substantially better in the ratings - I am sure they would have kept their 2.1 and 2.2s.
I am disappointed in the recent articles/interviews done by GW because they seem to have been basically soap boxes for TPRTS to make sweeping, insulting comments and cover your a$$ statements about why the show would be cancelled. I was particularly disappointed in the handling of cooper - to let him basically have a forum for his pimping - no hard questions nothing thought provoking about the issues that have created huge fan disgust and negativity and criticisms of S9 - nothing about how the criticism has affected the ratings, etc.
I am disappointed in Brad Wright. sorry - I guess this is OT - can someone tell me where that other OT thread is?
Comment