Good afternoon, Sparkies! Hope you're enjoying this fine Thursday! (Aside from busy servers that keep us from posting... grrr! )
Another Stargate!Ren update: The fourth and final installment of "The Mire" is now up.
On to Eri's CM questions:
1) Do you believe the ability to place a bomb on Atlantis--especially the way it was done in this episode--was plausible?
Yes. As we saw from the planning of the self-destruct in "The Siege," a mere bomb wouldn't have been enough to completely obliterate Atlantis. But making a ZPM go kaboom would certainly ensure that there wouldn't be enough of Atlantis left for the Wraith to reverse engineer and figure out how to get to Earth.
2) How did you feel about the enemy being a Go'uld?
With the Goa'uld having fallen pretty much by the wayside by this point over on SG-1, this was a great and unexpected twist.
3) Why do you think the writers turned this episode into old home week (aka, brought back so many previous characters)?
They needed a low-SFX bottle show.
4) Kavanaugh was particularly antagonistic in this episode. Do you think Elizabeth was right to suspect him most?
Given the really antagonistic and suspicious way he was acting, yes.
5) Do you agree with Kavanaugh's assessment of Elizabeth leading more by emotion than rational impartiality? If you do, why, and if you don't, where and how is he mistaken?
I think that Kavanaugh is partly wrong, and partly right. Elizabeth does always strive to lead with rational impartiality. She was an internationally renowned diplomat before coming to the Stargate program, and to be that good, she would need to know how to examine each side of a dispute fairly. Yet, she is human, and it's only natural for one's feelings to come to the fore, especially for a subject that she cares about strongly. But I also think that she proved in this case that she could keep her cool far better than Kavanaugh did. Crash and burn, Kavanaugh. Crash and burn.
6) Many PTB get really antsy about actually showing torture in a show that's not built for it. Do you think TPTB copped out here by having Kavanaugh faint? Or was it appropriate for the SGA audience?
As much as I would have liked to see something a little more realistic, SGA is not as heavy as some other genre shows, like Babylon 5 and Battlestar Galactica, which have not shied away from showing scenes of torture.
7) Did the twist at the end--the true perpetrator--catch you off guard?
Heck yeah! I totally didn't expect Caldwell; up until this point, his antagonism toward Weir and Sheppard can be very logically explained by resentment at Weir going over the heads of the SGC to get Sheppard promoted to Lt. Colonel and permanently given the post of military commander, a job that Caldwell probably otherwise would've gotten. Even so, he never seemed like a traitor.
8) Other than the obvious romantic implications Sparkies would like to see, would you have added any other 'bonding' elements to John and Elizabeth's relationship in this episode? Or was it done exactly as it should have been?
I think this episode was just right.
9) How was Teyla's storyline handled? If you approved, what did you like? If you didn't, what could have been changed to make it better?
I liked it. We got to see more of her ties to her people explored, something that has been seriously lacking for the character. I wish there could have been more, but with everything else going on, there just wasn't enough time.
10) Do you prefer these episodes--Atlantis contained--over the Pegasus-exploration episodes? Do you like more or less?
I'd prefer to see more Atlantis-based episodes. After all, the series is called Stargate Atlantis, not Stargate Pegasus Galaxy Quest. *snickers*
The whole point of the expedition was to find the city and explore its secrets. And after four years, we've seen precious little of that.
11) How does this rank for you as a Carl Binder episode? Were the relationships on or off? Is he really the writer for Sparkies? Or was there just so much going on that not everything (like a Ronan/Teyla connection) could be addressed?
One of Carl's best. Yes, there was a lot of different things going on, but it never felt rushed or that too much of one thing was crammed in at the expense of another.
And yes, Carl is the writer for Sparky.
12) Did you understand the episode when you were finished with it? How long did it take you to understand all that was going on?
Understood it perfectly the first time.
Another Stargate!Ren update: The fourth and final installment of "The Mire" is now up.
On to Eri's CM questions:
1) Do you believe the ability to place a bomb on Atlantis--especially the way it was done in this episode--was plausible?
Yes. As we saw from the planning of the self-destruct in "The Siege," a mere bomb wouldn't have been enough to completely obliterate Atlantis. But making a ZPM go kaboom would certainly ensure that there wouldn't be enough of Atlantis left for the Wraith to reverse engineer and figure out how to get to Earth.
2) How did you feel about the enemy being a Go'uld?
With the Goa'uld having fallen pretty much by the wayside by this point over on SG-1, this was a great and unexpected twist.
3) Why do you think the writers turned this episode into old home week (aka, brought back so many previous characters)?
They needed a low-SFX bottle show.
4) Kavanaugh was particularly antagonistic in this episode. Do you think Elizabeth was right to suspect him most?
Given the really antagonistic and suspicious way he was acting, yes.
5) Do you agree with Kavanaugh's assessment of Elizabeth leading more by emotion than rational impartiality? If you do, why, and if you don't, where and how is he mistaken?
I think that Kavanaugh is partly wrong, and partly right. Elizabeth does always strive to lead with rational impartiality. She was an internationally renowned diplomat before coming to the Stargate program, and to be that good, she would need to know how to examine each side of a dispute fairly. Yet, she is human, and it's only natural for one's feelings to come to the fore, especially for a subject that she cares about strongly. But I also think that she proved in this case that she could keep her cool far better than Kavanaugh did. Crash and burn, Kavanaugh. Crash and burn.
6) Many PTB get really antsy about actually showing torture in a show that's not built for it. Do you think TPTB copped out here by having Kavanaugh faint? Or was it appropriate for the SGA audience?
As much as I would have liked to see something a little more realistic, SGA is not as heavy as some other genre shows, like Babylon 5 and Battlestar Galactica, which have not shied away from showing scenes of torture.
7) Did the twist at the end--the true perpetrator--catch you off guard?
Heck yeah! I totally didn't expect Caldwell; up until this point, his antagonism toward Weir and Sheppard can be very logically explained by resentment at Weir going over the heads of the SGC to get Sheppard promoted to Lt. Colonel and permanently given the post of military commander, a job that Caldwell probably otherwise would've gotten. Even so, he never seemed like a traitor.
8) Other than the obvious romantic implications Sparkies would like to see, would you have added any other 'bonding' elements to John and Elizabeth's relationship in this episode? Or was it done exactly as it should have been?
I think this episode was just right.
9) How was Teyla's storyline handled? If you approved, what did you like? If you didn't, what could have been changed to make it better?
I liked it. We got to see more of her ties to her people explored, something that has been seriously lacking for the character. I wish there could have been more, but with everything else going on, there just wasn't enough time.
10) Do you prefer these episodes--Atlantis contained--over the Pegasus-exploration episodes? Do you like more or less?
I'd prefer to see more Atlantis-based episodes. After all, the series is called Stargate Atlantis, not Stargate Pegasus Galaxy Quest. *snickers*
The whole point of the expedition was to find the city and explore its secrets. And after four years, we've seen precious little of that.
11) How does this rank for you as a Carl Binder episode? Were the relationships on or off? Is he really the writer for Sparkies? Or was there just so much going on that not everything (like a Ronan/Teyla connection) could be addressed?
One of Carl's best. Yes, there was a lot of different things going on, but it never felt rushed or that too much of one thing was crammed in at the expense of another.
And yes, Carl is the writer for Sparky.
12) Did you understand the episode when you were finished with it? How long did it take you to understand all that was going on?
Understood it perfectly the first time.
Comment