Originally posted by nx01a
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What Star Trek Ep/Movie Did you Watch Today?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by aretood2Jelgate is right
-
Originally posted by Alan Wake View PostWarp 10 was also broken once in the old star trek series, and in TNG.
And if you look at future timelines, and future technology... things can indeed go faster.Originally posted by aretood2Jelgate is right
Comment
-
Originally posted by jelgate View PostThats the point. The notion Warp 10 makes you occupy every point in the universe is so stupid
I still would like to see a quote from the writers saying this isn't canon.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alan Wake View Postso is the notion of warp 11, 12 and onward... but those are still canon. The transporter turning you into children? that's stupid. A single individual with control over anything and everything in the universe? that's stupid... I fail to see how this goes above those.
I still would like to see a quote from the writers saying this isn't canon.Originally posted by aretood2Jelgate is right
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alan Wake View Postso is the notion of warp 11, 12 and onward... but those are still canon.
Originally posted by Alan Wake View PostThe transporter turning you into children? that's stupid.
Originally posted by Alan Wake View PostA single individual with control over anything and everything in the universe? that's stupid...
Originally posted by Alan Wake View PostI still would like to see a quote from the writers saying this isn't canon."A society grows great when old men plant trees, the shade of which they know they will never sit in. Good people do things for other people. That's it, the end." -- Penelope Wilton in Ricky Gervais's After Life
Comment
-
Originally posted by DigiFluid View PostI already posted that in this thread, read back a few posts.
I want to see that. What they said in that tiny article was what they thought. They weren't telling us it wasn't canon.
That's not stupid.
Comment
-
There was no science behind communicators or transporters or force fields when they were first written. Where's the science behind time travel? Please tell me you don't believe that slingshotting around a star will send you back in time...."A society grows great when old men plant trees, the shade of which they know they will never sit in. Good people do things for other people. That's it, the end." -- Penelope Wilton in Ricky Gervais's After Life
Comment
-
Originally posted by DigiFluid View PostThere was no science behind communicators or transporters or force fields when they were first written. Where's the science behind time travel? Please tell me you don't believe that slingshotting around a star will send you back in time....
But even though they didn't tell us the science behind those things, were could at least assume that there was something behind it.
With a being like the Q, we're just supposed to believe they're omnipotent... because they just are?
I don't even know where we were going with this argument. I'm lost.
Comment
-
Spoiler:We can start a thread re: Trek canon.sigpic
More fun @ Spoofgate!
Comment
Comment