Originally posted by ShadowMaat
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
General Ship ( Relationship) Discussion
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by littlemigueljrDo you have the same feelings about 'ships' with other tv shows? Because it seems like from many posts you have written/typed you dislike the general idea of 'relationship'.But then, the mentality of GG is completely different from that of Stargate. I feel that that show is more character oriented and thus lends itself to more speculation about ships in general and that ship in particular.
For me Stargate is, as I've said a hundred times before, about the PLOT. It's about the action, the stories, furthering the over-all adventure... the characters, while nice, are just a means to tell the STORY. That's why I don't like to see ship because, to me, it takes away from the STORY.
Comment
-
Originally posted by littlemigueljrI mentioned Upgrades because their feelings for each other was the reason why the machine, or the Zotar Detecter, detected them as Zotars, or something like that.
If they wanted to throw in the Zotar thing (insert insulting adjecive) why not create a situation in that episode? (although you know personally, I'd be happy -I mean cartwheel type - if they had never done it, but that's just me) Why try mucking up an episode that was done?I'm a girl! A girly girly girl!
Okay, you got me. I can't accept change. This message may look like it was typed on a computer and posted on the internet, but it is actually cave drawings delivered by smoke signals.
Naquada Enhanced Chastity Belts -SG1 edition. On sale now! Heck, I'll give them away
Daniel Jackson Appreciation and Discussion -because he's more than pretty
http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=89
Daniel Jackson: The Beacon of Hope and The Man Who Opened the Stargate
Comment
-
Originally posted by littlemigueljrDo you have the same feelings about 'ships' with other tv shows? Because it seems like from many posts you have written/typed you dislike the general idea of 'relationship'.I'm a girl! A girly girly girl!
Okay, you got me. I can't accept change. This message may look like it was typed on a computer and posted on the internet, but it is actually cave drawings delivered by smoke signals.
Naquada Enhanced Chastity Belts -SG1 edition. On sale now! Heck, I'll give them away
Daniel Jackson Appreciation and Discussion -because he's more than pretty
http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=89
Daniel Jackson: The Beacon of Hope and The Man Who Opened the Stargate
Comment
-
Chemistry is in the eye of the beholder. If you see it you see it, if you don't then you don't. I think that they have great chemistry. But I'm a romantic. I like romance in my t.v. shows. Especially star-crossed lover type romances. I like balance though too. Especially in an ensemble show. Since the show is Stargate SG-1 then I think the romance should be a sidebar. I like the subtle UST and the sideways looks but 9 times out of 10 when a show gives in and gives us a full-fledged romance they tend to muck it up so I'm quite content to wait until the very end.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShadowMaatIt depends. I'm an avid fan of Luke/Lorelai ship on Gilmore Girls because they "work" as a couple for me-Amanda, "Wallow Central."
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShipperahoyChemistry is in the eye of the beholder. If you see it you see it, if you don't then you don't. I think that they have great chemistry. But I'm a romantic. I like romance in my t.v. shows. Especially star-crossed lover type romances. I like balance though too. Especially in an ensemble show. Since the show is Stargate SG-1 then I think the romance should be a sidebar. I like the subtle UST and the sideways looks but 9 times out of 10 when a show gives in and gives us a full-fledged romance they tend to muck it up so I'm quite content to wait until the very end.Amanda, "Wallow Central."
Comment
-
as far as i know, upgrades and divide and conquer were always supposed to go together. the scripts were given to the same director at the same time as far as i'm aware. and martin wood directed upgrades with a lot of consideration to divide and conquer and vice versa. so it wasn't like, hey ya know we could possibly use this thing here to whack people over the head with ship! if i'm wrong correct me though
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShipperahoyI think that they have great chemistry. But I'm a romantic. I like romance in my t.v. shows.I'm a girl! A girly girly girl!
Okay, you got me. I can't accept change. This message may look like it was typed on a computer and posted on the internet, but it is actually cave drawings delivered by smoke signals.
Naquada Enhanced Chastity Belts -SG1 edition. On sale now! Heck, I'll give them away
Daniel Jackson Appreciation and Discussion -because he's more than pretty
http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=89
Daniel Jackson: The Beacon of Hope and The Man Who Opened the Stargate
Comment
-
Originally posted by stargate barbieas far as i know, upgrades and divide and conquer were always supposed to go together. the scripts were given to the same director at the same time as far as i'm aware. and martin wood directed upgrades with a lot of consideration to divide and conquer and vice versa. so it wasn't like, hey ya know we could possibly use this thing here to whack people over the head with ship! if i'm wrong correct me though
Comment
-
i believe that the cast of stargate could have great chemistry with a rock. i just think that it's the type of chemistry that seems to be open for interpretation. i know this isn't going to be a popular opinion with some of us. i'm sorry, but thats just how i feel about it... what do you think?
________________________
justanopinion. and a poorly placed and not very subtle quote.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stargate barbiei believe that the cast of stargate could have great chemistry with a rock. i just think that it's the type of chemistry thats open for interpretation. i know this isn't going to be a popular opinion with some of us. i'm sorry, but thats just how i feel about it... what do you think?
Comment
Comment