I loved sga, and one if the things I loved about it was that they didn't have the same rules and constraints to adhere to with regards to prisoner treatment and medical testing, for example I remember in serpents song from sg1 when we had apophis and tealc and oneill wanted to work him over for info but hammond refused to their methods saying, he's effectively a prisoner of war, and as such is afforded certain right's.....then jump to sga, where we not only take prisoners but routinely ran medical experiments on them, hell we even messed with their DNA ( Michael). My point being we got results when we didn't have to worry about small things like should we or shouldn't we, we just done it. You can tell from teylas reaction in the siege, part one I think it was, when she and sheppard are in a cloaked jumper during a culling and teyla, angry at sheppards apparant unwillingness to save people,says " I fear I expected to much ". If memory served ford was also willing to take a near depleted zpm from that planet of under 25's to bolster Atlantis defences while leaving The kids without protection. Fair enough they never done it but I think that was purely because it was nearly depleted, otherwise that zpm would have been ours..LOL. what do you think?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
welcome to the pegasus galaxy, normal rules do not apply.
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
If the ZPM wasn't depleted, I don't think the expedition would have stolen it. However, I do believe they would have tried to encourage the inhabitants to give the expedition the ZPM. In return, they could have offered them shelter by coming to Atlantis. The only reason why it didn't work out for the Athosians is because Sergeant Bates was "everyone's a spy" happy.
-
One things for sure,the Geneva Convention didnt apply in the Pegasus Galaxy lol. I need to rewatch some SGA as i cant recall right now but there were a ton of funny moments where i thought,"they would never have got away with this back at SGC lol. I'll try think of some examples but there are plenty.CheersO'Neill: So, what's your impression of Alar?
Teal'c: That he is concealing something.
O'Neill: Like what?
Teal'c: I am unsure. He is concealing it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by initial View PostIts quite Ironic that Atlantis was under civilian rule most of the time as they didnt want the millitary in charge yet as you have pointed out the millitary in charge of SG were actually more Moral and played by the rules more than the civilian charge at Atlantis lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by Arica15 View PostWhile I don't disagree with your summary I do wonder why you find this surprising....why is being a civilian leader more likely to mean the individual is moral than a military one?
Civilians dont know this unwriten code as they would not have been in that situation so do not have that "moral objection"
The p[oint I was actually making is that its ironic that people wanted civilians in charge of the SG projects as military couldnt be trusted when in fact you could argue that the military behaved better and promoted earth in a better light than the civilians did!
Comment
-
Originally posted by initial View PostHi Arica, think you may have misunderstood my point. Id actually does not surprise me at all that the military treated pow's in stargate better than the civilians did. After all there is a feeling in the military (well most of it) and always has been that you treat pow's how you want your pow's treated.
Civilians dont know this unwriten code as they would not have been in that situation so do not have that "moral objection"
The p[oint I was actually making is that its ironic that people wanted civilians in charge of the SG projects as military couldnt be trusted when in fact you could argue that the military behaved better and promoted earth in a better light than the civilians did!
On Atlantis part of the show was supposed to be that they were desperate and stranded so they had to bend the rules at times. This was somewhat sabotaged when they were no longer stranded, but the civilian oversite did okay some very unmoral standards. What really catches me when I think about it more, is the people that seemed the friendliest and least threatening like our friendly Dr.'s were conducting war crimes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Flyattractor View PostAs for the differnt "interogation" techniques between the Ghoul's and the Wraith. With the goa'uld there could be the consideration for the innocent host being envolved with it. With the Wraith they were just being big meanies to the poor space vampires.
Comment
-
Originally posted by initial View PostThe p[oint I was actually making is that its ironic that people wanted civilians in charge of the SG projects as military couldnt be trusted when in fact you could argue that the military behaved better and promoted earth in a better light than the civilians did!Last edited by Xaeden; 05 December 2012, 05:20 AM.
Comment
-
I think they didn't consider morality with the Wraith on the principle that they in fact were not human to begin with. To them they were just conscious animals. By the way the Wraith have absulutely no moral problem to keep other beings, mostly humans as a source of food. How would you feel about morality to an alien if you knew you are only food for them? As for other rules me myself too feel that they eased up a notch compared to SG-1's "strictness".sigpicHallowed are the Ori.
Comment
Comment