I'll solve the moral debates now with simple logic and reasoning.
The Facts:
Now Jervis got exactly, completely, utterly, precisely (etc.) what he wanted.
Jervis wanted to save the larger community of 700 by killing a few (about 30) from within that same community. Jervis preferred that the small group be the Balarans. Now it just happens that the few that were sacrificed happened to not be the Balarans but was instead Jervis and his cohort of underlings.
Jervis wanted to save the village and he did. Hooray for Jervis!!! He saved the town!!!
(we can also say that Darwin's theory of evolution is at play here but lets not get into that)
The Facts:
- Jervis had a goal, he wanted to save the villagers.
- Jervis' wanted to do this by sacrificing a small group from within the community.
- He wanted to do this along with a group of about 20 men.
Now Jervis got exactly, completely, utterly, precisely (etc.) what he wanted.
Jervis wanted to save the larger community of 700 by killing a few (about 30) from within that same community. Jervis preferred that the small group be the Balarans. Now it just happens that the few that were sacrificed happened to not be the Balarans but was instead Jervis and his cohort of underlings.
Jervis wanted to save the village and he did. Hooray for Jervis!!! He saved the town!!!
(we can also say that Darwin's theory of evolution is at play here but lets not get into that)
Comment