Do u think that in 10, 15, 20, maybe even in 30 to 40 years time that we would a fleet numbering over 3 to 4000 ships?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
fleet of the future
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Lord Excalibar View PostDo u think that in 10, 15, 20, maybe even in 30 to 40 years time that we would a fleet numbering over 3 to 4000 ships?sigpic
-
Originally posted by Aer'ki View PostAll depends on the need...if it were up to me I'd keep building ships as fast as they could come off the line. But if the MW proves to be less dangerous in the future, I could see them limiting production and working on improvements rather than raw numbers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Crazy Tom View PostImprovements? Whiel I aagree Earth could make their ships more practical, you rally can't improve the tech we have any more.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aer'ki View PostAll depends on the need...if it were up to me I'd keep building ships as fast as they could come off the line. But if the MW proves to be less dangerous in the future, I could see them limiting production and working on improvements rather than raw numbers.
and i agree there are plenty of room for improvements. i mean the railguns are great, but how about a wepon that could be used on fighters but also on motherships and be able to do significant damage. some sort of plasma wepons that shoot blobs of plasma like the one the asgards used before they invented the phasers.
and creating a nutrino ion generator would go a long way toward reaching the shield strengh, hyperdrive speed, and wepons power that the asgard possesed.STARGATE ROCKS
THERE IS NO BETTER SHOW
Comment
-
Id say 500 is more reasonable, but it depends what technology is used, Asgard beam based drydocks could contruct ships alot faster than we could but I think between 300 and 500 is reasonable in say 50 years.sigpic
You are the fifth race, your role is clear, if there is any hope in preserving the future it lies with you and your people ~ 8years for those words
Stargate : Genesis | Original Starship DesignThread Sanctuary for all | http://virtualfleet.vze.com/
11000! green me
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aer'ki View PostDo you really think a 304 could go toe to toe with an old Asgard ship? I don't think so, and we have the Asgard database, so there is a LOT of room for improvement once we finally grow smart enough to make the technology from the specs we have...and don't say we can synthesize it. That only works on small stuff, not whole ships.
the oddessy definitely could.as for the others, well untill we create a nutrino ion generator, you would need 2 regular ships to destroy an old asgard ship.STARGATE ROCKS
THERE IS NO BETTER SHOW
Comment
-
Originally posted by immhotep View PostId say 500 is more reasonable, but it depends what technology is used, Asgard beam based drydocks could contruct ships alot faster than we could but I think between 300 and 500 is reasonable in say 50 years.
that would require producing 6 to 10 ships a year and that would mean dedicating the sgc to retriving trinium for 50 years, unless we construct the ship yard offworld at the site of the mine. while yes i agree asgard beam based dry docks could make ships faster, it wont do us any good if there arent any materials to make them out of.
also having 500 ships just crewed by the u.s. would upset the rest of the worlds government and that would mean we would have to give ships to other countries so they dont feel like the u.s. is far superior to them and if there were ever to occur a world war 3 think of how much worse it would be with every major power controling dozens if not hundreds of the galaxys finest battle cruisers. personally, i think we might want to limit the production of that large of a number. after all, if earth became unstable and bad people got themselves in charge of a fleet of that size and decided to take over the galaxy, the rest of the galaxy would be defenceless.STARGATE ROCKS
THERE IS NO BETTER SHOW
Comment
Comment