If this hasn't started already this is the thread to discuss the movie "Stargate Continuum"
A few things that bug me..
a) If Ba'al's sword is "as thin as an atom" as Qetesh says to Ba'al when she double crosses him. The blade shouldn't even have mass, or weight, or exist within our visible range. The sword for that matter would also be increddibly fragile.
b) Landry had a good point. If they "correct" the timeline then the history of that Earth has been forever changed and millions of peoples lives potentially get snuffed out. Of course when the leave that Earth it may still exist in another timeline because time is full of timey wimey stuff but that bothered me. I was on Landry's side...
c) if they go back in time to the freighter to stop Ba'all how are they also back in the present? Did they vanish from the freighter?
d) Daniel should not be able to phone himself. Surely two of the same people can't exist in the same place and time? And we all know that if you travel back in time phoning yourself is a bad idea.......
A few things that bug me..
a) If Ba'al's sword is "as thin as an atom" as Qetesh says to Ba'al when she double crosses him. The blade shouldn't even have mass, or weight, or exist within our visible range. The sword for that matter would also be increddibly fragile.
b) Landry had a good point. If they "correct" the timeline then the history of that Earth has been forever changed and millions of peoples lives potentially get snuffed out. Of course when the leave that Earth it may still exist in another timeline because time is full of timey wimey stuff but that bothered me. I was on Landry's side...
c) if they go back in time to the freighter to stop Ba'all how are they also back in the present? Did they vanish from the freighter?
d) Daniel should not be able to phone himself. Surely two of the same people can't exist in the same place and time? And we all know that if you travel back in time phoning yourself is a bad idea.......
Comment