In 'Five Years Later' Peter admitted he was the bomb. He had a scar on his face (unlike current Peter) so it does seem to suggest that in the current timeline Claire's powers weren't all that helpful and that he was going to survive anyway, so he did pull it off?
Even Peter's mother said that because he had Claire's powers, he'd blow up and survive yet the episode itself seems to contradict The Company's founders idea that Peter would survive so he should be allowed to detonate.
Could it have just been something stupid like the explosion although originating from Peter, it expanded outward from his position instead of him actually exploding? This could work as it should have allowed him to survive but Claire's powers only come into play as part of the final timeline when Peter would have impacted the surface when he fell.
Any explainations or other theories?
Even Peter's mother said that because he had Claire's powers, he'd blow up and survive yet the episode itself seems to contradict The Company's founders idea that Peter would survive so he should be allowed to detonate.
Could it have just been something stupid like the explosion although originating from Peter, it expanded outward from his position instead of him actually exploding? This could work as it should have allowed him to survive but Claire's powers only come into play as part of the final timeline when Peter would have impacted the surface when he fell.
Any explainations or other theories?
Comment