Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

And now for something completely different....

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    And now for something completely different....

    What's the proper grammatical singular form of "Genii"? Genus?
    "A society grows great when old men plant trees, the shade of which they know they will never sit in. Good people do things for other people. That's it, the end." -- Penelope Wilton in Ricky Gervais's After Life

    #2
    Fish is the same singular and plural( when not talking about different groups of fish, so is deer , so I think the same applies to Genii.
    Never, never, never believe any war will be smooth or easy...

    ... or that any man can measure the tides and hurricanes he will
    encounter on the strange journey.


    Spoiler:

    2 Cor. 10:3-5
    3 For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh:
    4 (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds; )
    5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

    Comment


      #3
      Fungus --> Fungi
      Focus --> Foci

      Therefore,

      Genus --> Genii?
      "A society grows great when old men plant trees, the shade of which they know they will never sit in. Good people do things for other people. That's it, the end." -- Penelope Wilton in Ricky Gervais's After Life

      Comment


        #4
        Didn't we go through this same thing with the plural term of Anubis and settle on Anubi, or Anubii? I say let it go. Genii works for me.

        "We'll keep the light on for you."

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by DigiFluid
          What's the proper grammatical singular form of "Genii"? Genus?
          In english it depends on the origin of the word... for example, 'octopus' is a greek word so the correct plural would actually be 'octopodes' (not octopi as people in Seaworld keep insisting).

          Of course since Genii is neither latin or greek, I guess it's just whatever you prefer.

          A sci-fi/steampunk/fantasy novel... with color pictures!
          My Blog

          “This summer on Sci-Fi... as part of our five year mission to find the lowest common denominator, we bring you… Extreme Psychic Reality Makeover…!"

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by DigiFluid
            Fungus --> Fungi
            Focus --> Foci

            Therefore,

            Genus --> Genii?
            I think the plural for Genus would be Geni not Genii.

            Genii is really( in real life) the plural form of Genius, which would make sense:

            Fungus-fungi
            Focus-foci
            Genius- Genii

            Never, never, never believe any war will be smooth or easy...

            ... or that any man can measure the tides and hurricanes he will
            encounter on the strange journey.


            Spoiler:

            2 Cor. 10:3-5
            3 For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh:
            4 (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds; )
            5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

            Comment


              #7
              Let's face it - English is a crazy language. There is no egg in eggplant nor ham in hamburger; neither apple nor pine in pineapple. English muffins weren't invented in England or French fries in France. Sweetmeats are candies while sweetbreads, which aren't sweet, are meat.

              We take English for granted. But if we explore its paradoxes, we find that quicksand can work slowly, boxing rings are square and a guinea pig is neither from Guinea nor is it a pig.

              And why is it that writers write but fingers don't fing, grocers don't groce and hammers don't ham? If the plural of tooth is teeth, why isn't the plural of booth beeth? One goose, 2 geese. So one moose, 2 meese? One Jeep, 2 Jeeps. So One sheep, 2 sheeps?

              Doesn't it seem crazy that you can make amends but not one amend. If you have a bunch of odds and ends and get rid of all but one of them, what do you call it?

              If teachers taught, why didn't preachers praught? If a vegetarian eats vegetables, what does a humanitarian eat?

              Sometimes I think all the English speakers should be committed to an asylum for the verbally insane. In what other language do people:

              Recite at a play and play at a recital?

              Ship by lorry and send cargo by ship?

              Have noses that run and feet that smell?

              How can a slim chance and a fat chance be the same, while a wise man and a wise guy are opposites?

              How is it that you need two for a pair of earrings but only one for a pair of trousers?

              You have to marvel at the unique lunacy of a language in which your house can burn up as it burns down, in which you fill in a form by filling it out and in which, an alarm goes off by going on.

              English was invented by people, not computers, and it reflects the creativity of the human race, which, of course, is not a race at all. That’s why, when the stars are out, they’re bright, but when the lights are out, they’re dark.

              Comment

              Working...
              X