GateWorld is on wikipedia, take a look
-
Jedi_Master_Bra'tac, previously known as wako!
-
Course it is.
Comment
-
-
Cool.sigpic
"Ce qui ressemble a l'amour est toujours de l'amour." - Tristan BernardComment
-
Very cool! I like Wikipedia more and more everytime I go there to look something up. Maybe it will help to get more people watching the show, and of course, coming to Gateworld!
2004 Get in the Gate Winner
The less often a man makes declarative statements, the less apt he is to look foolish in retrospect.Comment
-
It's actually been there for a quite while under the stargate listing. Anybody can add any listing (there was a HUGE blowup as because anybody can add anything, they can add erroneous information and in the aforementioned case, it was more libelous than anything else). Wikipedia is a fun place to visit, but I don't count on it for accuracyOriginally posted by wako!
Comment
-
It's great! isn't it!!Originally posted by wako!
Often visit wikipedia,,,It's a fab source info,,,,just ah...don't take everything as absolute gospel!
As Prion says...Wikipedia is a fun place to visit, but I don't count on it for accuracy
Yesterday 02:56 PM
Comment
-
Wikipedia sorta reminds of the IMDB. 90% of it's good, but it's that 10% that if often terribly wrongOriginally posted by Flygirl:
Comment
-
i used to use wikpedia for stargate updates all the time...until i started here...well i suppose i still use it sometimes.
It is a great source but as everyone else said...at times it can be unreliable..its still quite interesting all the samesigpicComment
-
You mean Wikipedia isnt the source of all knowledge!
Damn, its been like a student essay research bible for years!
sigpic
You are the fifth race, your role is clear, if there is any hope in preserving the future it lies with you and your people ~ 8years for those words
Stargate : Genesis | Original Starship DesignThread Sanctuary for all | http://virtualfleet.vze.com/
11000! green me
Comment
-
Wikipedia is about as accurate as Brittannica in subjects that Brittannica has.Originally posted by prion View PostWikipedia sorta reminds of the IMDB. 90% of it's good, but it's that 10% that if often terribly wrong:Such a shame that I wouldn't know by now your revelations
Cut me in, I don't wanna live without your revelations.-AudioslaveComment
-
You know you've really made it when you are on Wikipedia.Comment
-
I love Wikipedia That's where I ran across Stargate: Worlds, which looks quiet promising. I noticed a lot of the Stargate content on Wikipedia, espcially the episodes, cite GateWorld 
Comment
-
Wikipedia rocks. I used it as a source for my capstone course all the time. (But the point of those exercises wasn't so much accuracy, as practice researching and citing sources.)
I love playing "follow the links" on Wikipedia.sigpic
"Let's not be too quick to exclude the possibility that the woman might be, uh... what is the clinical term? Nuts?" -- Rodney McKay, PhD
What does Cat have to say today?Comment
Comment