Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 46 of 46

Thread: So why did it end when it did?

  1. #41
    Brigadier General fems's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    8,663

    Default Re: So why did it end when it did?

    Then I'm sure it won't be the first 'religious' book to do so.

  2. #42
    Lieutenant Colonel
    Member Since
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,681

    Default Re: So why did it end when it did?

    Quote Originally Posted by siles View Post
    What if that book says kill all the rest, the non-believers?
    Bingo.

  3. #43
    Captain
    Member Since
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,495

    Default Re: So why did it end when it did?

    As I said, it doesn't stop it being relevant - if the themes are about truth, kindness etc. If it says kill non-believers, it is arguably not about "goodness", only self-serving.

  4. #44
    Lieutenant Colonel
    Member Since
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,681

    Default Re: So why did it end when it did?

    If I were following a religion and found out it was total fiction and that the gods were merely aliens, I wouldn't be following the good parts of the book. I'd abandon the entire thing in search of GOD himself. A moral code would be irrelevant without God as it's source, because it will vary from man to man.

  5. #45
    H.G. Wells LT. COL. John Sheppard's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 2011
    Location
    I Floated Away With Clooney
    Posts
    2,630

    Default Re: So why did it end when it did?

    Quote Originally Posted by Republibot 3.0 View Post
    Hi everyone.

    Forgive me for asking a question that's probably been asked and answered a hundred times on here, but I've wondered for quite a while now: Why did SG1 get cancelled?

    From what I've heard out of MGM, they were hoping to keep it going for at least another five years, and had pumped a ton of money into it to refresh it. The Ori arc was obviously intended to last a lot longer. Ratings were pretty good. Second-highest show on the network when it died.

    So why?

    Theories I've heard:
    1) It was simply not popular anymore, and everyone hated it.

    I don't buy this one.

    2) It became too expensive to produce, what with built in raises and production stuff and exchange rates and whatnot.

    Might be some truth here.

    3) The producers simply wanted out and killed their own show

    I don't believe this at all

    4) Sci-Fi/Syfy was annoyed that their original spinoff, SGA, was getting lower ratings than SG1, and was always going to be seen as a 'little brother' to the original. Thus they decided to kill SG1, despite the good ratings, so it would make their original SGA look better. If people wanted an SG fix, they'd have to come to Atlantis for it.

    To be honest, I suspect it's probably that one, with a bit of "2" as well. I've heard it rumored (Though never seen any proof) that MGM ran themselves ragged trying to find a new home for the show once they got word Sci-Fi was killing it. The most consistent rumors are that either CBS or Showtime were looking to pick it up. Then (Allegedly, according to rumor) Sci-fi involved a clause in their contract with MGM saying that no one else could run the show unless they (Sci-Fi) gave their approval. So not only did they not want the show anymore, they didn't want anyone else to run it anymore, either.

    Assuming that's true. I dont' know.

    So my question is: Why did the show end when it did and is there any truth to the rumor that Sci-Fi actually kept others from rescuing the show?

    Again, I apologize if this is common knowledge, but I'm a relative newb, and any info you folks could give would be greatly appreciated.
    I have to agree so much nad if you count the episodes after 200 its 214 or 215 so it raises eyebrows -like Teal'c

  6. #46
    Second Lieutenant
    Member Since
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    376

    Default Re: So why did it end when it did?

    Quote Originally Posted by Quizziard View Post
    As I said, it doesn't stop it being relevant - if the themes are about truth, kindness etc. If it says kill non-believers, it is arguably not about "goodness", only self-serving.
    I raise the issue only because they repeatedly said that the Book of Origin was entirely self-serving. Saying it's ok as a general moral textbook at the end makes no real sense. It's like saying "Mein Kampf is evil, but there's some great stuff about child rearing in there." It just doesn't follow.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •