Page 1 of 10 1 234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 181

Thread: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

  1. #1
    Staff Sergeant angela21's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Southampton, UK
    Posts
    84

    Post Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    In the season one SG1 episode Bloodlines Daniel and Sam come across an unguarded container filled with larval Goa'uld, they take one and as they are about to leave, Daniel considers killing the rest, Sam says if he did he would be no better then they are and they should just leave. Then Daniel turns around and shoots the container, killing all the Goa'uld.

    The Goa'uld would have one day gone on to possess a host but in their larval stage they are helpless and technically have done nothing wrong.

    Was he right to kill them?

  2. #2
    Jungle Pharaoh Atem's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    19,736

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    yes. the Goa'uld process genetic memory and will always be evil and try to regain their strangle hold on the galaxy.

  3. #3
    Major Sealurk's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Site 01, P7T-434. Also Lincolnshire, UK
    Posts
    2,451

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    Yes. These weren't natural predators, or potential Tok'ra, these were homicidal tyrants in the making, virtually guaranteed given their genetic memory. Maybe they are to be pitied for that, but not spared.

    Each would have been implanted into a Jaffa who would have gone on to kill in their 'god's name, spreading terror and death (killing the larval Goa'uld probably delays the arrival of a new 'batch' of Jaffa, maybe even stopping them from becoming full Jaffa at all).

    Assuming they survive to maturity in their Jaffa, they would then be implanted into some random and unwilling host, and they would wreak havoc on the galaxy (directly or indirectly) and start the cycle over again.
    "Wouldn't it be much worse if life were fair and all the terrible things that happen to us come
    because we actually deserve them? So now I take comfort in the general hostility
    and unfairness of the Universe" - Marcus Cole, Babylon 5


    Stargate Ragnarok | FF.net | AO3 | Lakeside | My Fallout 3 Mods | Poppy Appeal | Help For Heroes | Combat Stress

  4. #4
    Lieutenant Colonel LiliJ's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 2008
    Location
    Sunnydale, CA
    Posts
    3,501

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sealurk View Post
    Yes. These weren't natural predators, or potential Tok'ra, these were homicidal tyrants in the making, virtually guaranteed given their genetic memory. Maybe they are to be pitied for that, but not spared.
    At this stage I think they were. Yes, they have genetic memories, but what are memories to an infant? They still have to be taught and become characters. True, it is very unlikely that any would become anything other than what their predecessors are, but by killing them Daniel was robbing them of that chance.

    Visualise them as babies, newborns, adorable and helpless. Would you kill them now?
    ~Thanks to Achaja for my lovely birthday presents!!~

  5. #5
    Major Jeffala's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 2007
    Location
    in cahoots
    Posts
    2,338

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    Sam was wrong. An infant (or undeveloped) Goa'uld might not be able to permanently overtake a human, but it can control them for short periods of times, as seen in "The Enemy Within".

  6. #6
    Colonel Replicator Todd's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The United States of Evil
    Posts
    6,827

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    I dont' think so, no. How else did the Tok'ra come into existence, they are the same species as the Goa'uld. That proves the Goa'uld CAN change their ways IMO.
    Interested in trying out comics? Now is the perfect time with Marvel NOW!

  7. #7
    Colonel Kidwizz's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Australia
    Posts
    5,297

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    Quote Originally Posted by Replicator Todd View Post
    I dont' think so, no. How else did the Tok'ra come into existence, they are the same species as the Goa'uld. That proves the Goa'uld CAN change their ways IMO.
    Didn't the original Tok'ra queen give birth to all Tok'ra? So therefore ONE female Goa'uld changed her mind. The actual larva that get implanted inside the Jaffa are males(or not queens, not sure on the gender structure) carry the genetic memories that the queen wants to give them. The Tok'ra would NEVER trust a Tok'ra who was once a Goa'uld. That is why they have to be careful that if any is killed they cant just recruit more

    Also, Take Tanneth, they thought that he was good, but turned out to be just a plan old evil Goa'uld.

  8. #8
    Major gotthammer's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Lost in the Uncharted Territories
    Posts
    2,076

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    I'd say Daniel was right in killing the larval goa'uld. I agree w/ the reason/s given above pertaining to genetic memory. At the very least, if those larvae ever grew to maturity and got implanted, they'll be predisposed to do harm to others.
    Of course, the idea of 'redeeming' them may seem nice, but did that ever work out at all?

    Hmm...I'm also wondering: would those larval goa'uld make for good eating?

  9. #9
    Colonel Kidwizz's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Australia
    Posts
    5,297

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    Quote Originally Posted by gotthammer View Post
    Hmm...I'm also wondering: would those larval goa'uld make for good eating?
    Well. Chaka seemed to enjoy them... Not so much with the System Lords in Summit.

  10. #10
    Captain maylet's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In the Sanctuary
    Posts
    1,131

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    Yes, Daniel was right with what he did

    Knowledge is power, but how do you use that power defines whether you are good or evil

  11. #11
    Captain spinny magee's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Over There
    Posts
    1,422

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    Only seen that ep once can't remember, oh well so what if he killed a snake or two
    Tst

  12. #12
    Lieutenant Colonel SeaBee's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 2004
    Location
    Here and there... mostly there.
    Posts
    4,654

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    The Goa'uld are a parasitic lifeform which infests other races. Humans destroy parasites all the time. Better to kill them before they infest, rather than wait until they are in a host, when killing them usually involves the death of the host/Jaffa.
    http://forum.gateworld.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=29235&d=1297874202

  13. #13
    Staff Sergeant angela21's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Southampton, UK
    Posts
    84

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    I agree that with their genetic memories the Goa'uld larvae would most likely go on to do evil however, as well as the Tok'ra wasn't there another Goa'uld that wasn't related to the Tok'ra who had a change of heart? Can't remember her name or what the ep was but it was on Jonas's planet, she had been sent there by Baal to work undercover, something to do with naquadria, but ended up sacrificing herself to save Jonas and Sam. So there is the potential for them to overcome their genetic memories and become something more.

    Also, if they were human babies who were born with evil genetic memories, I think Daniel would be the first one to try to help them.

    I think that losing Sha're played a big part in Daniel's decision to kill them but I wonder if he ever regretted it?

  14. #14
    You call that a glowstick?
    (Moderator)
    Skydiver's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    51,041

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    Baby goa'uld are sentient beings.

    and they haven't done anything yet other than be born. How could daniel know, for 100%, that these goa'uld were going to take hosts? Yes, their biology dictates that, yet we've also learned that a Jaffa's life depends on having a goa'uld to crawl into its pouch...so he, theoretically, doomed a bunch of Jaffa, possibly children, to a lingering and painful death.

    All on the presumption of 'they're goa'uld, they must be evil because their parents must have been, so i need to kill them. (daniel didn't know the parentage of these goa'uld, how could he condemn them on their genetic memory if he doesn't know what that was?)

    It's not so easy as to say 'they're goa'uld, they must die'. they hadn't done anything to deserve dying yet.

  15. #15
    Captain Mongoletsi's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Ghetto, Manchester
    Posts
    1,490

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    Skydiver, ma'am.... we've been repeatedly told that the Goa'uld are "pure evil", and it's evidenced that even immature larval goa'uld are certainly malevolent.

    Kill or be killed innit.
    Mongoletsi is bigger than hip...hop...





  16. #16
    First Lieutenant VSHARMA's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 2006
    Location
    LONDON, ENGLAND
    Posts
    944

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    i would take one home and put them in my cat.

    For Wraith, hunger burns like a fire.

    Tell me, Sheppard, if you found yourself burning alive, would you settle for just one drop of water ...

    ....... or would you take more?



  17. #17
    Captain Steelbox's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    1,008

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kidwizz View Post
    Also, Take Tanneth, they thought that he was good, but turned out to be just a plan old evil Goa'uld.
    The Tok'ra did not believe Tanith was willing to become a Tok'Ra because he had a revelation that the Goauld where bad. He was going to infiltrate their ranks to spy on them from the beginning. Egeria the first Tok'Ra queen spawned all the "modern" Tok'Ra. Why did she do that? Well maybe in that time the Sarcophagus was used only by the System Lords, being viewed as a luxury to the less ranked and powered Goauld. Maybe Egeria was a low ranked queen and was one of the only ones that did not possessed access to a sarcophagus, and was not influenced by it.
    http://email.faxem.com.au/download/files/01445/1279070/iStock_000010944279Small_Header.jpg
    - SteamID user since 2005 -- you can add me - visit steam translation server brazil @ Steelbox

  18. #18
    Major Jeffala's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 2007
    Location
    in cahoots
    Posts
    2,338

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    Quote Originally Posted by VSHARMA View Post
    i would take one home and put them in my cat.
    As if cats weren't evil enough...





  19. #19
    Captain Steelbox's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    1,008

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    They arent. How can an animal that sleeps all after noon be evil?
    http://email.faxem.com.au/download/files/01445/1279070/iStock_000010944279Small_Header.jpg
    - SteamID user since 2005 -- you can add me - visit steam translation server brazil @ Steelbox

  20. #20
    Major Jeffala's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 2007
    Location
    in cahoots
    Posts
    2,338

    Default Re: Is morally acceptable to kill an infant Goa'uld?

    You just think they're sleeping. They're using that time to plan their next attack.

    http://www.catswhothrowupgrass.com/kill.php

Similar Threads

  1. Acceptable threads?
    By Lord Shiva in forum Light
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: October 24th, 2009, 11:28 AM
  2. Who are they going to kill off next?
    By tgmd in forum Battlestar Galactica
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: February 6th, 2009, 07:36 PM
  3. Morally Speaking...
    By AvatarIII in forum Off-Topic Chatter
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: October 5th, 2007, 12:52 AM
  4. Kill the show, but DO NOT kill the story
    By Peoples_General in forum General Stargate Discussion
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: September 22nd, 2006, 06:51 AM
  5. Replies: 19
    Last Post: April 25th, 2006, 08:27 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •