Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123 456 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 106

Thread: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

  1. #41
    Captain
    Member Since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,465

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Vala_M View Post
    Obviously. But the Russians have had the plans for the F-302 and the BC-303 since 2002 and they've never made one ship yet, why?
    That is the question as we all know that Russia has a very high capacity of making combat materials so they should have made atleast 2 more X304's since their first one was destroyed.

  2. #42
    Staff Sergeant KiLL3r's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    89

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    penelope? cmon you must be american to come up with such a stupid name for something british.

  3. #43
    Lord of the Bacon jelgate's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2007
    Location
    eating flowers
    Posts
    31,890

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by KiLL3r View Post
    penelope? cmon you must be american to come up with such a stupid name for something british.
    Thats kind of insulting to Americans.

    In Young We Trust

  4. #44
    Lieutenant Colonel Jedi_Master_Bra'tac's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2005
    Location
    University of Nottingham
    Posts
    3,823

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by jelgate View Post
    Thats kind of insulting to Americans.
    He's British..... we're always insulting Americans


    ETA: The name "Penelope" is insulting to Brits
    Jedi_Master_Bra'tac, previously known as wako!


  5. #45
    Captain
    Member Since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,465

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Jedi_Master_Bra'tac View Post
    He's British..... we're always insulting Americans
    Its not just a British sport. The enntire western world enjoys it aswell. Come up with almost any topic (its easier if its political) and i can tell you why the US of A has a negative influence on it

  6. #46
    Lieutenant General thekillman's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2007
    Location
    My Throne in Heaven
    Posts
    16,805

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by marty2006 View Post
    Interesting sig.
    * not getting your point *

  7. #47
    Probie Foley's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1

    Jack Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by clwaurie View Post
    I think it would be a bad idea for britain to build its own 304, it took us 750 million pounds to build wembley stadium and it was 4 years behind the intial schedule. I don't think the 304 would ever be finished and would probably bankrupt us.
    Has any one here watched the last eposide of sg1??(unending) The eposide were they got the asguard core... dont you think that they will use it to make new battleships... after all it would be cheaper and quicker.

  8. #48
    Lieutenant General thekillman's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2007
    Location
    My Throne in Heaven
    Posts
    16,805

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    too big. too complicated. no matter how powerfull, it couldnt do it. the alien components could be made cheaper however

  9. #49
    Captain marty2006's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,601

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by thekillman View Post
    * not getting your point *
    Lol, you're sig said you support good grammar, yet you started a sentence with but.

  10. #50
    Lieutenant Colonel Jedi_Master_Bra'tac's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2005
    Location
    University of Nottingham
    Posts
    3,823

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    You started your sentence with "lol"...

    Is ending one's sentences with ellipses considered bad grammar?
    Jedi_Master_Bra'tac, previously known as wako!


  11. #51
    Captain marty2006's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,601

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Jedi_Master_Bra'tac View Post
    You started your sentence with "lol"...

    Is ending one's sentences with ellipses considered bad grammar?
    I never declared to the public i supported good grammar or had good grammar for that matter.

  12. #52
    General GoSpikey's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Between Michael and Todd
    Posts
    26,803

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by marty2006 View Post
    Lol, you're sig said you support good grammar, yet you started a sentence with but.
    Good grammar/spelling also includes using capitals to begin with, and a dot or something else to finish with. And no typo's of course.

    'eight day'

    In Loving Memory of Wraithlord.

    I wish I got to know you better.

  13. #53
    Major General
    Member Since
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    12,444

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Vala_M View Post
    Obviously. But the Russians have had the plans for the F-302 and the BC-303 since 2002 and they've never made one ship yet, why?

    Vala,
    Because they don't have access to naquadah or trinium.

  14. #54
    Captain
    Member Since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,465

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by jenks View Post
    Because they don't have access to naquadah or trinium.
    Im sure the IOA would make sure that the Russians and any other nation which want Naquadah and Trinium get access to the gate so they can send mining teams all over the galaxy. The gate after all does belong to the Russians and other countries building X304's would be in everyones best interest.

  15. #55
    Major General
    Member Since
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    12,444

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    If the US doesn't want Russia to get trinium or naquadah then they won't do, the IOA only controls the gate because of their funding, I'm sure the US would rather lose the funding than surrender those sort of materials to Russia, and the IOA would know that.

  16. #56
    Captain
    Member Since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,465

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by jenks View Post
    If the US doesn't want Russia to get trinium or naquadah then they won't do, the IOA only controls the gate because of their funding, I'm sure the US would rather lose the funding than surrender those sort of materials to Russia, and the IOA would know that.
    Except you forget that the Russians have already built their own X304 so that means they must have already used the gate to go to other planets to mine the materials.

  17. #57
    Major General
    Member Since
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    12,444

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by ykickamoocow View Post
    Except you forget that the Russians have already built their own X304 so that means they must have already used the gate to go to other planets to mine the materials.
    They never built that, it was given to them by the US in exchange for their lease of the gate being extended.

  18. #58
    Captain
    Member Since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,465

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by jenks View Post
    They never built that, it was given to them by the US in exchange for their lease of the gate being extended.
    I'll have to take your word for it as i havent watched that particular episode in quite awhile.

    In any case the USA would have no choice but to give other countries access to the gate as with all the countries that are aware of the gate they have alot of power not only could they introduce harsh economic laws against America but they could also reveal the existences of the Stargate programme to the entire world.

  19. #59
    Major General
    Member Since
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    12,444

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    So why haven't they? Every country would be clamoring over themselves to get their hands on a 304 if they could, so why haven't we seen any other than US ones?

  20. #60
    Captain
    Member Since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,465

    Default Re: Spoilers! new ship name! NEW SHIP NAME

    Quote Originally Posted by jenks View Post
    So why haven't they? Every country would be clamoring over themselves to get their hands on a 304 if they could, so why haven't we seen any other than US ones?
    They havent built the X304 because the writers havent written it. Assuming for a minute that the Stargate Universe is real then in reality most of the countries which are aware of the programme would have the technology and access to the gate as the countries which are aware are some of the most powerful in the world. They may not beable to defeat America in a military engagment (due to Asgard tech) but they could certainly cripple the United States economy.

    Clearly the Stargate Universe isnt real but its still important for the writers to make it seem as real as possible but i find other countries reactions to the Stargate programme in the Stargate Universe to be very odd and unrealistic.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 34
    Last Post: May 2nd, 2009, 05:53 PM
  2. Goa'uld gate ship why not a specialised ship??
    By Darkstar in forum General Stargate Discussion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: December 5th, 2008, 05:18 PM
  3. ANUBIS'S SUPER-WEAPON Ship vs Ori Ship
    By fugiman in forum SG-1 Science and Tech
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: February 17th, 2007, 03:24 PM
  4. Replies: 27
    Last Post: July 15th, 2006, 10:53 AM
  5. OT3/love triangles ship thread - for when an easy ship with two ain't enough
    By Purpleyin in forum SG-1 Characters & Relationships
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: September 19th, 2005, 04:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •