What crimes could/should Sheppard be charged with?

[blue-skyz]

Secret or not, there is still accountability - remember Makepeace and his friends? I doubt very much that there are any public records of them being sentenced, but they still were. If anyone working at the SGC or on Atlantis was found to be guilty of a crime, they would still have to pay the price, just secretly.

There is accountability. But, as Woolsey has done twice, reports get falsified when it serves the greater good (or keeps Woolsey from enduring endless questions.) The SGC made the decision to falsify the report of Wallace’s death before the fact. That included the decision to hold Sheppard blameless for his ‘negligence’ during the incident.

If Sheppard had acted without the prior knowledge of the SGC, he would have been held accountable and be awaiting disciplinary action. He would not have returned to Atlantis. A court martial would be far to public and involved for the situation. Sheppard could have been quietly and simply dealt with in several ways. He could have found himself in a cell in the SGC, dishonorably discharged, back in Antarctica, or, if his experience was considered too invaluable to lose, back on Atlantis, demoted or with a loss of pay and privileges.

It would be difficult to bring any charges against Sheppard (they have to be secret) without first talking to his commanding officer, in this case, probably, Landry, to find out his reason for accepting the report. In fact, no charges would have been brought until all the principles had been interviewed and there had been an investigation of the circumstances and a recommendation of what charges to bring and who should be charged.

Even if Wallace's crimes merited the death penalty, and he had been duly sentenced, it would still be a crime for the Wraith to kill him, or for him to be in any way manipulated or pressured into allowing himself to be killed.

He was not ‘in any way manipulated or pressured into allowing himself to be killed,’ IMO. This is always going to be ‘an eye of the beholder’ situation. Legally speaking, I don’t think what Sheppard actually said can be interpreted as undue influence.

Wallace’s death was, however, facilitated. There is no other scenario that can explain what happened. Wallace walked to his death on his own. Sheppard took him to the lab, unchained the Wraith, made d@mn sure that the guards would not try to save him and stood by while the Wraith killed Wallace. What Sheppard said to Wallace in inconsequential and immaterial to the actual act of facilitating his suicide.

Originally Posted by AncientThor
John just let him know all the options and the situation, what is at stake.

Wow, I hope the defence don't try to make that case. The above sentence alone would indicate that Sheppard was willing to allow a civilian to be fed upon by the wraith, and that he used pressure to gain his cooperation.

No it doesn’t..

What Sheppard said to Wallace was very carefully worded (by the writers). There is nothing in the conversation but the basic facts of the situation. There is intentionally nothing in the wording that can be specifically construed as ‘pressure.’ There is no mention of feeding the Wraith, no wording that indicates that Sheppard would be willing to feed anyone to the Wraith and certainly no overt encouragement for Wallace to volunteer to be fed to the Wraith.

[bluealien]

There were no ‘clean’ solutions here. Our morality is offended because there is no solution that ends ‘they lived happily ever after.’ Our sense of justice is offended because it was not an evil man who wanted so badly to save his daughter that he disregarded other people’s lives and families.

We can all stand on a different side of the fence where morals are concerned and this is not about offending our morality, it's about our sense of justice. Sheppard took the law into his own hands and sought his own justice to find the solution that best suited him. Walllace was clearly held accountable for his actions, but Sheppard doesn't seem to have to follow the same laws. No matter the circumstances, or how noble your intentions are you cannot take the law into your own hands and perpetrate a crime. Wallace should have been afforded the same rights as any prisoner in custody and kept in a safe environment until such time as he was transported to whatever facility he was going to end up to await trial. He should not have been presented with options that included taking his own life or escorted to a place where his life was taken from him without any inteference from Sheppard, whether he agreed to do this or not.

I believe that Sheppard clearly pressured Wallace into doing what he did but even if some want to believe that Sheppard played no part in Wallace's decision, he clearly aided and abetted in a suicide and failed to keep a prisoner safe in his custody, this alone is gross negligence.

This is a muddy tale of desperation, bad outcomes, unthinkable choices, guilt, remorse, and selflessness. Sheppard’s solution is not legal or right, but it is the best one among the horrible possibilities. He chooses to allow the man responsible to right his wrong and takes the burden of how that was accomplished onto himself.

It's a tale of muddy desparation on the part of both men while one was held accountable and the other wasn't. Sheppards solution was not legal or right and you can only argue that it was the best solution if you agree with the outcome. Most, obviously agree with the outcome as the other alternative was for Rodney to die. So in other words it was the best solutions for Rodney and Sheppard. You could also use the same analogy if Wallace's daughter had surivived. Then I guess you could say that Wallace would have achieved the best solution, even if his methods of arriving at that solution were wrong.

He chooses to allow the man responsible to right his wrong and takes the burden of how that was accomplished onto himself.

If Wallace had overheard Rodney agreeing to sacrifice himself to the Wraith to save Jeannie and had freely (no presentation of options from Sheppard) agreed to take Rodney's place, then I could understand Sheppard standing back and letting Wallace " right his wrong" if you will. But this didn't happen and it was not about Sheppard caring whether Wallace righted his wrong, or even whether Wallace wanted redemption, it was about Sheppard using the mans guilt and remorse against him to accomplish what he wanted, and that was to save Rodney. His actions were not right or legal, or the best solution, it was the only solution that Sheppard could come up with that secured Rodneys life and that was his goal, to save Rodney. But just because Sheppard saw this as his only solution doesn't excuse what he did, the same way Wallace couldn't be excused for what he did. But our alliance lies with Sheppard and Rodney and obviously our emotional attachments, so we are going to choose Wallace's life over Rodneys, but this still does not make it any more justifiable. It just makes it easier to accept, because like Rodney we are stunned that Sheppard would go to such lenghts as talking a man into killing himself (Rodney's words)so we don't really want to think about exactly what Sheppard did to achieve this. It's probably easier on the consience of both men to believe that it was all about Wallace wanting to achieve redemption and forget about the part where he got a helping hand in achieving that redemption.

[blue-skyz]

We can all stand on a different side of the fence where morals are concerned and this is not about offending our morality, it's about our sense of justice.

Justice is not an absolute.

The ‘clean’ solution:
1. Either Sheppard does nothing
or, maybe, Sheppard has his conversation with Wallace, but Wallace does not care about Jeannie and her family. He would rather save his own life and become a murderer.
2. Sheppard convinces the SGC to restrain McKay or otherwise keep him away from the Wraith.
It certainly would not be ‘justice’ to allow an innocent man (or any other?) to commit suicide for any reason.
Sheppard in a jumper with an atomic bomb comes to mind.
3. Jeannie dies.
4. The Wraith dies,
or is taken back to Pegasus and either released again
or they try to capture a wraith for him to feed on so he can continue his work on the Replicator attack code.
5. Wallace gets the form of ‘justice’ meted out to those that breach national security and learn secrets that they cannot be trusted with. Wallace is a murderer. That is undeniable. McKay was there; the viewers witnessed it. Wallace killed Jeannie with the premeditated injection of nanites during the felony of kidnapping. He has nothing left to lose. He has dug his grave. He cannot be trusted outside of secure areas, so he is unlikely to ever be allowed out of wherever they hide major security risks.
6. McKay? What does McKay do after Jeannie dies?

It’s hard when ‘justice’ isn’t just.
Just who is ‘justice’ suppose to protect?
Who is best served by ‘justice’.’ the criminal or the victim?

Sheppard took the law into his own hands and sought his own justice to find the solution that best suited him. Walllace was clearly held accountable for his actions, but Sheppard doesn't seem to have to follow the same laws. No matter the circumstances, or how noble your intentions are you cannot take the law into your own hands and perpetrate a crime. Wallace should have been afforded the same rights as any prisoner in custody and kept in a safe environment until such time as he was transported to whatever facility he was going to end up to await trial.

Sheppard was dealing with the fall out from Wallace’s crimes. Sheppard wanted the solution that was best for Wallace’s victims.

Wallace was never going to get a trial in the traditional sense. There would be some kind of decision or judgment about him, then he would have been hidden away. The government is quite capable of dealing with his disappearance.

He should not have been presented with options that included taking his own life or escorted to a place where his life was taken from him without any inteference from Sheppard, whether he agreed to do this or not.

Wallace was never presented with any options. That is the beauty of Sheppard’s words.
Wallace had to draw his own conclusions, make up his own mind and ask to be allowed to save Jeannie.

If this had not been Wallace’s decision, I doubt that the SGC would have allowed it. I might be able to picture Sheppard, acting on his own, arranging to get Wallace to the Wraith, and managing to pull off the feeding, but in no way can I picture him getting away with it.

But then there remains the problem of protecting the Wraith. Sheppard had to be absolutely sure that the Wraith would not be harmed or it would all have been for nothing. Acting on his own, I do not believe he had enough authority to be sure he could control the SGC guards. The SGC brass would allow Wallace to save his victim but they would not have allowed Sheppard to force Wallace in to doing it. IMO

I believe that Sheppard clearly pressured Wallace into doing what he did but even if some want to believe that Sheppard played no part in Wallace's decision, he clearly aided and abetted in a suicide and failed to keep a prisoner safe in his custody, this alone is gross negligence.

Oh, Sheppard played a part in Wallace’s decision. He gave him the facts necessary to make a decision. Sheppard didn’t make the decision for Wallace and he didn’t tell him that he was to blame for Jeannie’s impending death and he didn’t tell him to give up his life to save her. The facts speak for themselves.

I agree that Sheppard facilitated Wallace’s suicide. And he did it in a way that had to be personally horrifying to him. He is a protector and he allowed a man to die. He has been fed on by a Wraith and he allowed another to be fed on. It would have been far easier for Sheppard to let Jeannie die.

The report supposedly reads that he, in effect, ‘failed to keep a prisoner safe.’ That would be negligence. The SGC must have seen it as unavoidable/unforeseeable/justifiable negligence because they accepted the report and sent him back to Atlantis.

It's a tale of muddy desparation on the part of both men while one was held accountable and the other wasn't. Sheppards solution was not legal or right and you can only argue that it was the best solution if you agree with the outcome. Most, obviously agree with the outcome as the other alternative was for Rodney to die. So in other words it was the best solutions for Rodney and Sheppard.

McKay would not have died, Jeannie would have. McKay would never have gotten close to the Wraith. Sheppard could easily accomplish that with the help of the SGC. The SGC would never have permitted McKay to sacrifice himself. The aftermath of Jeannie’s death would have been devastating to everyone. Sheppard would not have saved McKay and he would not have saved himself. Wallace’s gift to all of them.

You could also use the same analogy if Wallace's daughter had surivived. Then I guess you could say that Wallace would have achieved the best solution, even if his methods of arriving at that solution were wrong.

No. I would never say that.

If Wallace’s daughter had lived, it would not justify kidnapping two innocent people with armed and masked men, assaulting the husband and a federal agent and injecting known-to-be-dangerous nanites into an innocent woman who was trying to help.

Wallace’s actions are not comparable to Sheppard’s on any level.
Wallace is the cause of the mess that leaves Jeannie dying and Sheppard, McKay and the Wraith on Earth. Sheppard’s actions are an attempt to salvage something from Wallace’s mess.
Sheppard’s actions are an attempt to keep Wallace’s victims, both Jeannie and McKay, from suffering more.

If Wallace had overheard Rodney agreeing to sacrifice himself to the Wraith to save Jeannie and had freely (no presentation of options from Sheppard) agreed to take Rodney's place, then I could understand Sheppard standing back and letting Wallace " right his wrong" if you will.

Wallace was in a holding room. He was not wondering the walls catching snatches of conversation or hanging out in the cafeteria listening to gossip. Maybe he could have gleaned the current circumstances through osmosis or divination. Or maybe he could have thrown some money around to get information the way he did to get national secrets. Someone had to tell him the situation. The information is far too specific to have been learned by chance. The viewer would have suspected an overheard conversation, anyway, and it would not have had the dramatic impact that Sheppard’s quiet telling of the facts had.

And Sheppard never presented Wallace with options.

But this didn't happen and it was not about Sheppard caring whether Wallace righted his wrong, or even whether Wallace wanted redemption, it was about Sheppard using the mans guilt and remorse against him to accomplish what he wanted, and that was to save Rodney. His actions were not right or legal, or the best solution, it was the only solution that Sheppard could come up with that secured Rodneys life and that was his goal, to save Rodney.

Sheppard could have saved McKay. All he had to do was keep him away from the Wraith until Jeannie died. Of course, after that, it wouldn’t have been the same McKay.

McKay wants to save Jeannie. He feels guilty about Jeannie being involved in secrets that draw dangerous people, but he didn’t even bring her into it originally, Carter did. The thing is, McKay is not guilty. He is a victim, as surly as Jeannie is. If Sheppard had allowed McKay to die, how would that have been ‘justice‘? If Sheppard had allowed McKay to die, it would have been assisted suicide and he would have paid for it. The SGC would never have approved McKay’s sacrificing himself.

But just because Sheppard saw this as his only solution doesn't excuse what he did, the same way Wallace couldn't be excused for what he did.

Not the same way. Again, not comparable.

Sheppard is not ‘clean’ here, but Sheppard was caught in Wallace’s mess. He was navigating a moral mine field. Wallace chose his path and endangered innocent people in pursuit of his own goals. Not comparable, at all.

But our alliance lies with Sheppard and Rodney and obviously our emotional attachments, so we are going to choose Wallace's life over Rodneys, but this still does not make it any more justifiable. It just makes it easier to accept, because like Rodney we are stunned that Sheppard would go to such lenghts as talking a man into killing himself (Rodney's words)

Words that Sheppard denies and a conclusion that is not supported by Sheppard’s actual words to Wallace. But, what took place is clear to the viewer and I was astonished.

It does not require the viewer to be infatuated with Sheppard and McKay to believe that it is better to have the instigator of the mess suffer for it rather than his innocent victims.

so we don't really want to think about exactly what Sheppard did to achieve this. It's probably easier on the consience of both men to believe that it was all about Wallace wanting to achieve redemption and forget about the part where he got a helping hand in achieving that redemption.

Redemption is never mentioned in the episode. It is a notion from morality plays and was summoned up by the viewer to fit the circumstances (and verified by JM). Neither Sheppard nor McKay care a twit about Wallace’s redemption. McKay cares that he got his sister back. Sheppard cares that Jeannie didn’t die, McKay didn’t die, the Wraith didn’t die and they still have a chance to stop the Replicators. Sheppard carries the burden of how that was accomplished.

[expendable_crewman]

We can all stand on a different side of the fence where morals are concerned and this is not about offending our morality, it's about our sense of justice. Sheppard took the law into his own hands and sought his own justice to find the solution that best suited him.

I can't say what the writers intended, but it doesn't work for me if the ep's ending was about serving the law or justice.

I agree Sheppard boiled his choices down to a solution that suited him. I guess where we disagree is whether or not Sheppard got off clean.

Sheppard was not serving the law or justice. Walllace was clearly held accountable for his actions, but Sheppard doesn't seem to have to follow the same laws. No matter the circumstances, or how noble your intentions are you cannot take the law into your own hands and perpetrate a crime. Wallace should have been afforded the same rights as any prisoner in custody and kept in a safe environment until such time as he was transported to whatever facility he was going to end up to await trial. He should not have been presented with options that included taking his own life or escorted to a place where his life was taken from him without any inteference from Sheppard, whether he agreed to do this or not.

In universe, Wallace would not have been afforded the same rights of a prisoner in custody. In universe, he's stolen data on a top secret project, kidnapped scientists assigned to a top secret project that affects an ongoing war with global implications.

I mention that, because in this discussion we-- me included --keep going back and forth between in-universe and out-of-universe platforms.

But I really don't care where Wallace was headed because I don't think the law and justice were objectives present in the last few moments MC.

One can argue that consequences, maybe, just maybe, were boiled down to an old-style eye-for-an-eye type of thing. There are long-running feuds and unrest ongoing today where Sheppard's actions would make sense in a justice scenario.

I guess that I don't see Sheppard in a "quest for rough justice" kind of thing here. I see him capable of appreciating the horror of what he did, and I see him approaching Wallace because, as he said, when assessing blame, Wallace carried the lion's share.

It's a "who's going to clean up this mess" thing, because I think it's a mistake to ignore that Wallace is the reason Sheppard was in the Milky Way to begin with. Wallace is the reason Jeannie wasn't home reading Madison stories. He is the reason the Wraith made history as the first Wraith to visit the SGC.

And even so, it's still not a justice issue, it's less complicated than that, and I do believe justice is complicated. Well, not justice, but the administration of it.

By definition, justice must be without emotion in order to be effective. It must be impartial and relevant. If Wallace was to face justice, he would have been stripped of his reasons, the things that make us like him, and he would have had to face his crimes for what they were, no mitigating factors-- mitigating factors, unless they support an affirmative defense, are for sentencing. There wasn't any justice in MC's ending, and I saw no attempt at administering it.

I believe that Sheppard clearly pressured Wallace into doing what he did but even if some want to believe that Sheppard played no part in Wallace's decision, he clearly aided and abetted in a suicide and failed to keep a prisoner safe in his custody, this alone is gross negligence.

I wonder why Wallace gets no credit for making up his mind. I saw a character worthy of that. I've seen grief in spades, falling down on the ground grief, screaming your head off grief. In his grief, Wallace coordinated a massive and pretty successful undertaking. He hired people, paid them, gave orders. He deconstructed the SGC's security and he talks clearly about facing the consequences. He passes the legal standard for sane. Why isn't he allowed credit for making all his decisions?

And, yes, Sheppard aided and abetted a suicide, which is prosecuted as murder in some states in the US.

It's a tale of muddy desparation on the part of both men while one was held accountable and the other wasn't. Sheppards solution was not legal or right and you can only argue that it was the best solution if you agree with the outcome. Most, obviously agree with the outcome as the other alternative was for Rodney to die. So in other words it was the best solutions for Rodney and Sheppard. You could also use the same analogy if Wallace's daughter had surivived. Then I guess you could say that Wallace would have achieved the best solution, even if his methods of arriving at that solution were wrong.

It's too bad we can't argue whether or not it was the best solution for Wallace, even though Wallace picked it, because we don't agree Wallace was able to make this choice for himself.

(Even though we can accept that other characters, also grieving, are able to make this choice-- another thing I find interesting.)

So ... with that off the table ... I agree it was neither legal nor right on Sheppard's part, at least the parts Sheppard chose for himself. He chose to facilitate Wallace's decision.

Btw, in an either / or, how do you decide who gets the carrot?

If it's Rodney or Wallace, as you say, why is it okay for it to be Rodney, or Sheppard, or anyone other than Wallace? Why MUST Wallace be protected, and Jeannie die? Who dies in order for her to live?

For me, here's the either / or that I see: Wallace feeds the Wraith or Jeannie dies. Since Rodney spoke before he acted, Sheppard is capable of preventing Rodney from feeding the Wraith. Rodney's not even in it anymore. If Rodney was in it, and Rodney was allowed to feed the Wraith, the same sin is on Sheppard's soul ... facilitating a suicide. The only difference between Wallace and McKay ... and it's not who is more likable, who is whose friend ... the only relevant difference is Rodney didn't create the mess that's endangered Jeannie's life, Wallace did.

Btw, if it's a question of who is the most deserving Wraith fodder, I am at a loss ... because I don't think people should be used to feed Wraith.

That's what made the ep interesting.

Good story idea: If people shouldn't be fed to Wraith, write a situation where a Wraith has to be fed or a person dies.

And ...

If Wallace had overheard Rodney agreeing to sacrifice himself to the Wraith to save Jeannie and had freely (no presentation of options from Sheppard) agreed to take Rodney's place, then I could understand Sheppard standing back and letting Wallace " right his wrong" if you will.

Clean, and actually what I expect from this show.

Would we still be on this thread if the way out was the easy road?

But this didn't happen and it was not about Sheppard caring whether Wallace righted his wrong, or even whether Wallace wanted redemption, it was about Sheppard using the mans guilt and remorse against him to accomplish what he wanted, and that was to save Rodney.

As opposed to having two large, physically fit Marines sit on Rodney.

His actions were not right or legal, or the best solution, it was the only solution that Sheppard could come up with that secured Rodneys life and that was his goal, to save Rodney. But just because Sheppard saw this as his only solution doesn't excuse what he did, the same way Wallace couldn't be excused for what he did.

Sheppard is not excused. Wallace is dead, so he gets a pardon. Sheppard gets no such thing.

But our alliance lies with Sheppard and Rodney and obviously our emotional attachments, so we are going to choose Wallace's life over Rodneys, but this still does not make it any more justifiable.

The either / or, if there was any, was feed the Wraith or Jeannie, Wallace's victim, dies.

It just makes it easier to accept, because like Rodney we are stunned that Sheppard would go to such lenghts as talking a man into killing himself (Rodney's words)so we don't really want to think about exactly what Sheppard did to achieve this.

I'm knocking myself out thinking about it.

It's probably easier on the consience of both men to believe that it was all about Wallace wanting to achieve redemption and forget about the part where he got a helping hand in achieving that redemption.

Redemption, intersting. What if Wallace chose to feed the Wraith because if he didn't, EITHER his victim would die ... OR some other poor guy would. Redemption was too far down the road in the scenario, I think, just like justice. It was, to me, more like "push this button and save Jeannie and oh by the way whoever pushes this button gets a terminal case of whatever."

Sort of like Daniel in Meridian, or Sheppard in Ark.

It's do this thing and save somebody.

Isolate Wallace from the ability to make a choice, and of course he can't make it.

But they didn't isolate him from the information. Sheppard laid it out for him. Wallace chose. He died. The Wraith lived. Jeannie lived. Sheppard lives with being the highest-ranking man in the lab when a Wraith drained the life force from a guy who, as it turns out, had the fiber to offer to push the button.

What do you think should happen to Sheppard?

Under spoilers for topic-unworthiness:

Spoiler:

Sometimes I take special orders, remember, bluealien? If you had creative control of a follow-up story, and MC happened exactly as it happened, what do you think should happen to Sheppard in the aftermath?

[ReganX]

No matter the circumstances, or how noble your intentions are you cannot take the law into your own hands and perpetrate a crime. Wallace should have been afforded the same rights as any prisoner in custody and kept in a safe environment until such time as he was transported to whatever facility he was going to end up to await trial. He should not have been presented with options that included taking his own life or escorted to a place where his life was taken from him without any inteference from Sheppard, whether he agreed to do this or not.

Long and very good post - sorry I have to snip so much of it. The purpose of this thread, and please correct me if I'm wrong, is to establish which crimes Sheppard could or should be charged with, so his actions are far more relevant than his motives or what was at stake. This isn't the trial, so it isn't a case of conviction.

Right now, it's not a question of "why" so much as "what" - what did Sheppard do that he shouldn't have done? What didn't he do that he should have done?

Once charges are brought, the defence will have their chance to argue either (a) that Sheppard did not do what he is accused of doing, or (b) that Sheppard may have done what he was accused of, but that he was right to do what he did. The prosecution will have to argue the reverse.

I believe that Sheppard clearly pressured Wallace into doing what he did but even if some want to believe that Sheppard played no part in Wallace's decision, he clearly aided and abetted in a suicide and failed to keep a prisoner safe in his custody, this alone is gross negligence.

So that's one possible charge, right there.

What would it be called if Sheppard had pressured Wallace into offering himself up as a Wraith snack? Coercion?

[blue-skyz]

The purpose of this thread, and please correct me if I'm wrong, is to establish which crimes Sheppard could or should be charged with

Every time I start to simply lay out the charges, they turn into a tangle of possibilities.
I have to conclude that there is nothing simple about Miller’s Crossing.

There is a distinct difference between the crime Sheppard actually committed and the one that is apparent and provable.

This issue is complicated by several things.

It took place in a closed environment with tight security and many cameras and potential witnesses. Everything that occurred would be immediately knowable.
Care would have been taken to make sure the cameras saw only what fitted the reported occurrence. The witnesses would have been selected for their ability to ‘understand’ what they saw. (In other words, I think they would have staged it so that what is visible on security cameras can, at least, ambiguously, be seen to fit the intended explanation. Disabling the cameras or losing the files is too suspicious.)

The incident took place in a military setting, so a determination needs to be made about whether Sheppard had authority/orders/permission for his actions, whose authority Sheppard was acting under, if any, how high up does the knowledge and consent go, who else had knowledge beforehand and consented, who was in charge of security and provided access to Wallace and the control of the SGC guards that was vital to ensuring the Wraith was not killed, and who, both in authority and complicity, are chargeable? Sheppard is not alone in this.

Is Sheppard chargeable if he was acting with the authority of his superiors?

The SGC is at war. How much authority does the SGC have to act on its own in furtherance of that war effort? Does that extend to allowing a civilian to volunteer for a suicide mission?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Things we need to know:

There needs to be a determination of who we are going to pretend initiated the charges against Sheppard. Landry obviously didn’t; he had to know beforehand and he accepted the version in the report and allowed Sheppard to return to Atlantis.

Related to that is who received the tape and what did they do with it?

Who sent the tape? Who is the snitch? (At least in general terms)

Will there be an investigation by JAG(?) to determine what charges are prosecutable?

Will a hearing (this is extremely secret stuff, so probably not a real Article 32 hearing) be held to determine what charges will be brought against Sheppard?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The charge that is apparent and provable is negligence. That charge is conceded in the report Sheppard said he would write. Degree of negligence is another mater.

Landry would have given Sheppard authority to allow Wallace to sacrifice himself, but Sheppard would go through the motions following it. He would immediately go to Landry, the commanding officer, and explain what took place (the Wraith got lose and fed on Wallace). In a case of real negligence, Landry could have held him or released him. Sheppard would have written his report, the contents having been verbally accepted by Landry and probably read and signed before Sheppard left.

Sheppard returned to Atlantis with the Wraith as soon as he was allowed to leave. The Wraith needed to continue work on the Replicator attack code.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sheppard’s actual crime is facilitating a suicide or participating in an activity where it was previously known that the death of a civilian was unavoidable.

If Wallace had permission of the SGC (Landry), and it is extremely difficult to believe that this could have occurred without it, then Wallace had, in fact, volunteered for what amounted to a suicide mission.
Can a civilian be allowed to go on a suicide mission? In time of war? Where the outcome may save many lives? Resistance fighters come to mind. (I know, in the immediate, only Jeannie’s life is at stake, but the SGC would be looking at a broader outcome.)

Sheppard made Wallace aware of the situation (the conversation we saw), he must have participated in Wallace’s gaining permission from the SGC and he did the actual deed: he took Wallace to the Wraith, released the Wraith, allowed the Wraith to kill Wallace and falsified the report.

Sheppard did not pressure Wallace. He didn’t make the decision for Wallace, he didn’t tell him that he was to blame for Jeannie’s impending death and he didn’t tell him to give up his life to save her. Wallace had to draw his own conclusions, make up his own mind and ask to be allowed to save Jeannie. So, no coercion.

Complicit in this are Landry, the colonel in charge of security and various others.

This is unlikely to be a provable charge against Sheppard. I could, however, see the SGC having to justify it at some point.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Either charge is going to be a problem for the SGC. Even though the report admits some degree of negligence, the SGC had compelling reasons to allow the report to be falsified and cannot permit Sheppard to be charged. He is not expendable . The SGC is complicit; the incident is secret in the extreme; who steps in to determine if the SGC was justified given the circumstances? O’Neill? Or had he already been informed? The IOA? The pentagon? Some Senate committee? The president?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Anyway, as I see it, either negligence or facilitating a suicide, but not both.

It is interesting, that the more we go over this, the more facets of it we uncover; the more ways we find to look at it; the more directions my brain runs off in. The writers did an excellent job of finding a way to feed a Wraith, while creating a fascinating moral dilemma and an even more interesting Sheppard.

[expendable_crewman]

Anyway, as I see it, either negligence or facilitating a suicide, but not both.

It is interesting, that the more we go over this, the more facets of it we uncover; the more ways we find to look at it; the more directions my brain runs off in. The writers did an excellent job of finding a way to feed a Wraith, while creating a fascinating moral dilemma and an even more interesting Sheppard.

Sorry I snipped your post.

Facilitating a suicide is the more serious, because it could be treated like murder. I think Dr. Death, the euthansia doctor, went to a state in the US and helped a patient commit suicide and that state's penal code said assisted suicide was the same as murder, so they got him for murder.

The UCMJ-- big hefty document, too little time --is probably clear on how it applies to military people.

You're right, I think the push to prosecute would come from the outside and then hit a big hard wall.

I tried to imagine what would make the SGC, the Joint Chiefs, the Air Force, and the President allow a probe into an incident involving a being from another galaxy, the military commander of a flying holy grail of technology based in another galaxy, and a civilian CEO who found out about wormhole travel between galaxies and it's, well, it's got to come from some external source, and then, I think, that external source would have to be able to take Sheppard's action out of the context of all that exotic stuff we call the Stargate bubble, just look at it from the perspective of John and Jane Mainstream, and let John and Jane lose their minds.

Sheppard at the mercy of people who have no knowledge of wormhole travel, Asurans, Wraith, the fact he's encountered a species that needs to feed on lifeforce to finish life-saving equations ... We'd need a whole new code to address this ... whereas and wherefor said Wraith (see terminology) is hungry, section 4(c)(1.b) (see chapter entitled "when it is okay to accept volunteers to feed a Wraith) would apply if under chapter 53a, subsection 7, the Wraith was determined to be necessary to an operation deemed by an appropriate authority a matter of National Security ...

Yeah, okay ... If it's just an in-custody death that he stood by and let happen ... he's toast.

You can't adequately or even halfway explain "suicide by Wraith" or "volunteer to be Wraith food" or "I let him commit suicide to save a victim" without laying down the foundation that is the Pegasus: an enemy that can create the Hot Zone virus, charred planets, an alliance of species, nanites that could potentially cure cancer, and the wormhole thingee that connects it all.

[blue-skyz]

You're right, I think the push to prosecute would come from the outside and then hit a big hard wall.

I tried to imagine what would make the SGC, the Joint Chiefs, the Air Force, and the President allow a probe into an incident involving a being from another galaxy, the military commander of a flying holy grail of technology based in another galaxy, and a civilian CEO who found out about wormhole travel between galaxies and it's, well, it's got to come from some external source, and then, I think, that external source would have to be able to take Sheppard's action out of the context of all that exotic stuff we call the Stargate bubble, just look at it from the perspective of John and Jane Mainstream, and let John and Jane lose their minds.

Your fanfic kept me enthralled far into the night. I think you did an excellent job of setting up a credible scenario where influential people bump up against the SGC’s cover story in Miller’s Crossing hard enough to make them take action other than just squashing the investigation. Hard enough to make Sheppard have to deal with the fall out. Good read. I recommend it to anyone interested in the can of worms that is Miller’s Crossing.

Sheppard at the mercy of people who have no knowledge of wormhole travel, Asurans, Wraith, the fact he's encountered a species that needs to feed on lifeforce to finish life-saving equations ... We'd need a whole new code to address this ... whereas and wherefor said Wraith (see terminology) is hungry, section 4(c)(1.b) (see chapter entitled "when it is okay to accept volunteers to feed a Wraith) would apply if under chapter 53a, subsection 7, the Wraith was determined to be necessary to an operation deemed by an appropriate authority a matter of National Security.

Yep, better hire themselves a whole bunch of lawyers. …I’m still laughing.

Yeah, okay ... If it's just an in-custody death that he stood by and let happen ... he's toast.

He would be. And it wouldn’t take them long to figure it out. But since he’s not toast…
Got to tell you something.

You can't adequately or even halfway explain "suicide by Wraith" or "volunteer to be Wraith food" or "I let him commit suicide to save a victim" without laying down the foundation that is the Pegasus: an enemy that can create the Hot Zone virus, charred planets, an alliance of species, nanites that could potentially cure cancer, and the wormhole thingee that connects it all.

Hard to get a fair trial in the real world where none of those things can be mentioned, let alone explained. I wonder how long it would take the average upper middle class educated man to grasp the enormity of all that and how exposed and vulnerable it makes life on Earth.

We keep coming up with new analogies to help us look at and understand what happened in Miller’s Crossing.
I particularly liked the simplicity of your ‘button’ idea.

What if Wallace chose to feed the Wraith because if he didn't, EITHER his victim would die ... OR some other poor guy would.
…
It was, to me, more like "push this button and save Jeannie and oh by the way whoever pushes this button gets a terminal case of whatever."
….
It's do this thing and save somebody.
…..
Isolate Wallace from the ability to make a choice, and of course he can't make it.

But they didn't isolate him from the information. Sheppard laid it out for him. Wallace chose. He died. The Wraith lived. Jeannie lived. Sheppard lives with being the highest-ranking man in the lab when a Wraith drained the life force from a guy who, as it turns out, had the fiber to offer to push the button.

The ‘button’ takes away all the emotional trappings and leaves the real issue exposed.
In what situations is it all right or even honorable to ‘push the button.’
When is giving up your life to save another heroic and when is it just suicide?

[expendable_crewman]

Your fanfic kept me enthralled far into the night. I think you did an excellent job of setting up a credible scenario where influential people bump up against the SGC’s cover story in Miller’s Crossing hard enough to make them take action other than just squashing the investigation. Hard enough to make Sheppard have to deal with the fall out. Good read. I recommend it to anyone interested in the can of worms that is Miller’s Crossing.

Thanks! I'm glad you liked it.

Hard to get a fair trial in the real world where none of those things can be mentioned, let alone explained. I wonder how long it would take the average upper middle class educated man to grasp the enormity of all that and how exposed and vulnerable it makes life on Earth.

I know, it's why I asked if the CM thread was going in-universe or out-of-universe. Should be interesting to see (or read) once it gets going.

We keep coming up with new analogies to help us look at and understand what happened in Miller’s Crossing.
I particularly liked the simplicity of your ‘button’ idea.

The ‘button’ takes away all the emotional trappings and leaves the real issue exposed.
In what situations is it all right or even honorable to ‘push the button.’
When is giving up your life to save another heroic and when is it just suicide?

I think it's both. The harder question is when it is okay to * let * another person give up his or her life to save other(s), and when do you say "no way" and stay (for lack of a better description) in the box and accept any and all deaths that happen by following the conventional and (again, for lack of a better word) clean or safe path as par for the course.

[desh]

Sheppard clearly crossed the line of Justice with a capital J; he took an unethical course of action by facilitating Wallace's death, including blatantly falsifying his report by altering the facts in the presence of witnesses. Whether he saved Jeannie or not is beside the point, for he willingly allowed a serious breach of security, in which Wallace died; it is Sheppard's fault.

On the other hand, he did save Jeannie's life, which certainly counts for something.

I'm just curious to see how the I.O.A. will respond to this. Sheppard now has some serious dirt that the I.O.A. is sure to dig up and exploit.

[blue-skyz]

Sheppard clearly crossed the line of Justice with a capital J; he took an unethical course of action by facilitating Wallace's death, including blatantly falsifying his report by altering the facts in the presence of witnesses. Whether he saved Jeannie or not is beside the point, for he willingly allowed a serious breach of security, in which Wallace died; it is Sheppard's fault.

On the other hand, he did save Jeannie's life, which certainly counts for something.

I'm just curious to see how the I.O.A. will respond to this. Sheppard now has some serious dirt that the I.O.A. is sure to dig up and exploit.

Forget the IOA for the moment.

If Sheppard blatantly falsified a report of an incident that involved the facilitated death of a civilian in custody and a serious breach in security and that incident took place in the presence of witnesses (SGC personnel) and probably security cameras, what would the SGC (Landry) do?

From the end of Miller’s Crossing, Sheppard sitting in Atlantis reading a comic book, the SGC (Landry) evidently did nothing.

I’d be more interested in seeing how the IOA responds to the SGC, because the SGC had to approve Sheppard’s report before the IOA ever saw it. I’d love to see that conversation between Woolsey and Landry.

BTW, I agree, none of this could have happened without Sheppard being a part of it. What he personally did, facilitating Wallace’s suicide, even if it was to save the life of another, would be considered illegal in most places. His actions are morally ambiguous. Sheppard, himself, shows considerable discomfort with the morality of what he has done.

[Pajus]

IMHO, Shep could've been charged with: Severe violation of security protocols, negligence resulting in the death of a civilian person, possibly aiding in espionage against the US military and I guess him giving top secret information to a Wraith for the purpose on saving Jeannie is not exactly okay either

[Agent_Dark]

I’d be more interested in seeing how the IOA responds to the SGC, because the SGC had to approve Sheppard’s report before the IOA ever saw it. I’d love to see that conversation between Woolsey and Landry.

oh yes. the same IOA that, spoilers for Ark of Truth

Spoiler:

were secretly willing to sacrifice SG1 and the Odyssey by re-introducing replicators (the bug versions) who were immune to the ARG's. The same replicators that Earth and the Asgard went to alot of trouble to eradicate. I really dont think Landry and the SGC would really care about co-operating with the IOA anymore.

[blue-skyz]

IMHO, Shep could've been charged with: Severe violation of security protocols, negligence resulting in the death of a civilian person, possibly aiding in espionage against the US military and I guess him giving top secret information to a Wraith for the purpose on saving Jeannie is not exactly okay either

I understand the ‘negligence resulting in the death of a civilian.’

Without explanation, I have no idea how the other charges come into play.

oh yes. the same IOA that, spoilers for Ark of Truth

Spoiler:

were secretly willing to sacrifice SG1 and the Odyssey by re-introducing replicators (the bug versions) who were immune to the ARG's. The same replicators that Earth and the Asgard went to alot of trouble to eradicate. I really dont think Landry and the SGC would really care about co-operating with the IOA anymore.

I assume that we are still dealing with the same version of the IOA that selected Sam as Leader of Atlantis and sent Woolsey to do her 3 month evaluation.

Whatever, happened during the Arc of Truth SG1 movie either does not concern Stargate:Atlantis or was, supposedly, dealt with before the season began. (unless, of course, Sam took some time off from Atlantis before MC to go rejoin SG1 and change our current perception of the IOA.)