Page 1 of 5 1 234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 83

Thread: Mission # 30185 200 spoilers

  1. #1

    Default Mission # 30185 200 spoilers

    I noticed that the SG1 gang is giving Mitchell garbage about 30185. Was there really a 30185 and if so what was it?

  2. #2
    Chief Master Sergeant Konman72's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Posts
    245

    Default Re: Mission # 30185


  3. #3

    Thor Re: Mission # 30185

    Actually it was more likely the "Foothold" event. That event was sealed and erased from the official record. They told him that they went back to 1969, so it can't actually be the mission that was sealed and expunged, else they wouldnt have said that much.

  4. #4
    General the fifth man's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Running for my life from a hoard of zombies.
    Posts
    34,095

    Default Re: Mission # 30185

    Personally, I think they were just messing with him. Not just about the 1969 mission, but the whole Mission # 30185 thing too. Just my opinion.

    MS - "Boy, wow that's a great question!"
    "...phu...ah..."
    "Anyone know what SENTIENT means???"
    Sunday is my favorite day for two reasons - Football and The Walking Dead

  5. #5
    Staff Sergeant 1LostFurling's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Don't know, I'm 1 Lost Furling
    Posts
    75

    Default Re: Mission # 30185

    Quote Originally Posted by GDO_Gremlin
    I noticed that the SG1 gang is giving Mitchell garbage about 30185. Was there really a 30185 and if so what was it?
    Ah yes...soon to be another great question raised by TPTB, yet never answered. Is O'Neill Mitchell's father?

    Hmmm......

  6. #6
    Captain Gater_Gurl's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    ASCENSION Parish, Louisiana
    Posts
    1,264

    Default Re: Mission # 30185

    Quote Originally Posted by spg_1983
    Actually it was more likely the "Foothold" event. That event was sealed and erased from the official record. They told him that they went back to 1969, so it can't actually be the mission that was sealed and expunged, else they wouldnt have said that much.
    That's what I was thinking too.

  7. #7
    General the fifth man's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Running for my life from a hoard of zombies.
    Posts
    34,095

    Default Re: Mission # 30185

    Quote Originally Posted by 1LostFurling
    Ah yes...soon to be another great question raised by TPTB, yet never answered. Is O'Neill Mitchell's father?

    Hmmm......
    I would say no. We saw Mitchell's Dad in "Collateral Damage" last season.

    MS - "Boy, wow that's a great question!"
    "...phu...ah..."
    "Anyone know what SENTIENT means???"
    Sunday is my favorite day for two reasons - Football and The Walking Dead

  8. #8
    Staff Sergeant 1LostFurling's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Don't know, I'm 1 Lost Furling
    Posts
    75

    Default Re: Mission # 30185

    Quote Originally Posted by the fifth man
    I would say no. We saw Mitchell's Dad in "Collateral Damage" last season.
    I neglected to consider that ep from last year...I hope this does not linger as an unresolved storyline. I need to rewatch last season's episode and see if there was any "wiggleroom" left by the writers about his father. It seemed if tonight's episode did a good job of wrapping up and discounting the "made up" storylines. This storyline about Jack possibly being Mitchell's father was left unresolved.

  9. #9
    General the fifth man's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Running for my life from a hoard of zombies.
    Posts
    34,095

    Default Re: Mission # 30185

    Quote Originally Posted by 1LostFurling
    I neglected to consider that ep from last year...I hope this does not linger as an unresolved storyline. I need to rewatch last season's episode and see if there was any "wiggleroom" left by the writers about his father. It seemed if tonight's episode did a good job of wrapping up and discounting the "made up" storylines. This storyline about Jack possibly being Mitchell's father was left unresolved.
    I'm as sure as I can be that they were just messing with him.

    MS - "Boy, wow that's a great question!"
    "...phu...ah..."
    "Anyone know what SENTIENT means???"
    Sunday is my favorite day for two reasons - Football and The Walking Dead

  10. #10
    Chief Master Sergeant Konman72's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Posts
    245

    Default Re: Mission # 30185

    Quote Originally Posted by the fifth man
    I'm as sure as I can be that they were just messing with him.
    Me too. It was resolved, especially since O'Neill didn't have sex with anyone in 1969, Sam wouldn't have let him even if he wanted to, what with the whole "not messing with history" thing.

  11. #11
    Lieutenant General Mitchell82's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Atlantis
    Posts
    16,341

    Chevron Re: Mission # 30185

    Quote Originally Posted by Konman72
    Me too. It was resolved, especially since O'Neill didn't have sex with anyone in 1969, Sam wouldn't have let him even if he wanted to, what with the whole "not messing with history" thing.
    Exactly. They were just messing with him to see his reaction.
    Proud Sam/Jack and Daniel/Vala and John/Teyla Shipper!
    "We're Americans! Shoot the guys following us!"
    Don S. Davis 1942-2008 R.I.P. My Friend.

  12. #12
    Lieutenant Colonel 2ndgenerationalteran's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In the back of your neck, controling your brain
    Posts
    3,783

    Default Re: Mission # 30185

    haha, i loved that. i can see the resemblence
    Their white flags are no match to our guns!!

  13. #13
    Chief Master Sergeant
    Member Since
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    112

    Default Re: Mission # 30185

    Quote Originally Posted by 1LostFurling
    Ah yes...soon to be another great question raised by TPTB, yet never answered. Is O'Neill Mitchell's father?

    Hmmm......

    In the 'live commentary' thread we had going during the first airing, it seemed pretty much agreed that NOTHING we saw during "200" actually happened in the "real" Stargate universe.

    The whole thing was a joke, and next week none of what we saw will be counted as having happened.

    As for O'Neill being Mitchell's father, it's possible this was also an insider joke refering to something that happened on Browder's previous show FARSCAPE.

    The character John Crichton mentioned at one point that he'd lost his virginity at the age of 16 to a girl by the name of Karen Shaw.

    Later, they did a time travel episode where the whole cast of characters ended up on Earth, in Crichton's hometown, when he was 16.

    The alien girl Amanda represented during 200's Farscape spoof, Chiana (white/gray hair and skin), ended up alone with 16 year old Crichton, and couldn't yet speak English. (It was late October, and he thought her alien looks were a Halloween costume.)

    With the two of them trying to communicate with each other and her really BAD attempts at repeating English words, he somehow ended up thinking her name was Karen Shaw.

    When FARSCAPE's fans realized that Chiana may have been the girl Crichton lost his virginity to, speculation arose that in a few months, back in the present, Chiana would turn out to be pregnant with the child of 16 year old Crichton. (This was about the same time it was learned Claudia's character was also preggers with Crichton's baby.)

    This may have been having a little fun with that, namely, a child being conceived/sired by a time-traveler, with any real contact between the child and parent taking decades to happen.

    Chiana never did turn out to be pregnant, by the way. (At least not that we know of.)

  14. #14
    Second Lieutenant ascendedancient42's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Cedar City, Utah, United States, Earth, Milky Way
    Posts
    304

    Default Re: Mission # 30185

    Quote Originally Posted by Konman72
    Me too. It was resolved, especially since O'Neill didn't have sex with anyone in 1969, Sam wouldn't have let him even if he wanted to, what with the whole "not messing with history" thing.
    She wasn't watching him every single moment. She had to sleep at some point, and they were in the past for a good amount of time, at least several days...

    I know it's a joke, and a funny one at that, but it still leaves me with some lingering doubts as to it's seriousness/sillyness.

    If I just had the DVD, I'd watch it again and watch for a moment where he could have left the group.
    Mammals suck!

    "Real men don't need inertia dampers."

    Check out my GURPS campaign setting wiki, Islands of War!

    Stop sending me friendship requests. I will deny them all, regardless of who they come from.

  15. #15
    Major General Pharaoh Atem's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    19,735

    Default Re: Mission # 30185

    foothold there shouldn've had told jonas

  16. #16
    Staff Sergeant Famous's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    94

    Default Re: Mission # 30185 * 200 spoilers

    I thought the 30185 thing was a reference to the episode '100 days', where O'neill gets trapped offworld, and there was speculation as to whether or not he'd fathered a child with that lady Laira(I think that's her name). Either that, or the Farscape thing
    I do not believe you are well. You called me... "Lucy"

  17. #17

    Default Re: Mission # 30185 * 200 spoilers

    I thought the whole O'Neill thing was to mock the idea that some fans had that Mitchell didn't deserve his job at the SG-1, that he must've had some connection somewhere who pulled strings to get him the leader role, or that there was no way the real Jack O'Neill would've ever given someone like Cam any position he wanted like that. So the show did a whole joke about it and took it a step further, implying that Jack was Cam's daddy. LOL

  18. #18
    Major
    Member Since
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Long Beach, LI (NY)
    Posts
    2,482

    Default Re: Mission # 30185 * 200 spoilers

    Quote Originally Posted by ShardsofGlass
    I thought the whole O'Neill thing was to mock the idea that some fans had that Mitchell didn't deserve his job at the SG-1, that he must've had some connection somewhere who pulled strings to get him the leader role, or that there was no way the real Jack O'Neill would've ever given someone like Cam any position he wanted like that. So the show did a whole joke about it and took it a step further, implying that Jack was Cam's daddy. LOL
    Bingo !!!

  19. #19
    First Lieutenant stewsith's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 2005
    Location
    England, United Kingdom
    Posts
    862

    Default Re: Mission # 30185 * 200 spoilers

    Quote Originally Posted by Famous
    I thought the 30185 thing was a reference to the episode '100 days', where O'neill gets trapped offworld, and there was speculation as to whether or not he'd fathered a child with that lady Laira(I think that's her name). Either that, or the Farscape thing
    But it was obvious they were talking about 1969. They even said "well it was the 60's, it was wild back then".

  20. #20
    Second Lieutenant Dromag67's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Endor
    Posts
    498

    Default Re: Mission # 30185 * 200 spoilers

    I think TPTB put it on purpose so we would make threads like these asking what mission it was!
    I'm proud to be an American.
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...daowned4gx.gif
    "...and those who are prideful and refuse to bow down shall be laid low and made unto dust."

Similar Threads

  1. Is Destiny's Mission what set everything in motion?
    By jsonitsac in forum SGU General Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: December 7th, 2010, 09:46 AM
  2. The Mission
    By kernl sandrs in forum SGU General Discussion
    Replies: 117
    Last Post: November 15th, 2010, 07:44 AM
  3. Replies: 25
    Last Post: March 11th, 2010, 09:01 PM
  4. bulldog's mission .spoilers
    By somedude in forum Battlestar Galactica
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 18th, 2006, 06:48 AM
  5. Mission file 30185 -- Episode 200, what is it?
    By HarSins in forum Season Ten
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: September 12th, 2006, 10:38 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •