Welcome to GateWorld Forum! If this is your first visit, we hope you'll sign up and join our Stargate community. If you have questions, start with the FAQ. We've been going strong since 2004, are we are glad you are here.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Doctor Who News, Articles, Cast and Crew Interviews
Earlier this month, Nasa's New Horizons space probe sent back new images from Pluto.
Naturally, people got excited by the amount of detail it picked out on the dwarf planet and it's largest moon, Charon.
The only issue - they didn't have any names to use to refer to Charon's craters and plains.
So Nasa opened the naming process to the public. Predictably, the result was a dream for sci-fi fans everywhere.
According to the International Astronomical Union - the official governing body for names of celestial objects - Charon's features should be named after "destinations and milestones of fictional space and other exploration; fictional and mythological vessels of space and other exploration; fictional and mythological voyagers, travellers and explorers".
Lots of options then.
Many of the names are drawn from movies, TV shows and books including Star Wars, Star Trek and Doctor Who.
For example, the dark spot near the north of Charon is called Mordor in reference to the region which features in Lord of the Rings.
The New Horizons team is now set to submit the plans to the IAU for final approval.
According to New Horizons planetary scientist Mark Showalter, who spoke to Mashable, there's a "decent chance" of the names being given the go ahead.
The IAU has previously approved features on Saturn's moon Titan named Frodo and Bilbo.
Last edited by Blencathra; 30 July 2015, 03:49 AM.
Drop your Susan, Jenny, Rani and Chloe Webber speculation right now! Steven Moffat has said that Maisie Williams is playing a new character and is definitely not a returning character.
Speaking at the Television Critics Association’s press tour Moffat said: “Once you see what she’s up to you’ll appreciate what a clever idea [the role] was. It’s a significant role, we’re not just throwing her away. It’s a great part and she’s terrific in it.
He adds: “One thing I think is worth saying, because it keeps coming up as an issue, is that she is not playing a returning character. She’s a new character, she’s not a character from the Doctor’s past.”
Everything on this webpage is absolutely true! But here's my personal reason for looking forward to the next series - I'm a Doctor Who fan. I love all eras and all the many cast and aesthetic changes throughout the 50+ years and been with it through thick and thin. Tuning in to this show is as natural as breathing to me. You'll find me in front of a telly on September 19th. Do Not Disturb.
I think there has to be something more to it than Steven Moffat concentrating on Sherlock. He's managed doing both shows in the past.
Also, the BBC had two main money spinners - Doctor Who and Top Gear. Well we know what's happened to Top Gear, so that leaves them with Doctor Who. Why would they want, or allow, less of it?
No, if the article is true (and that's a big if) then I think there must another reason.
I have my fingers & everything crossed that they need extra time for preparation to go to film in New Zealand & for Peter Jackson to direct. Ever the optimist.
Last edited by Blencathra; 06 August 2015, 03:56 AM.
As long as we get *some* new Doctor Who in 2016, I don't much care if it's a full season, a split season, or a season of feature length specials.
sigpic Long before you and I were born, others beat these benches with their empty cups,
To the night and its stars, to the here and now with who we are.
Another sunrise with my sad captains, with who I choose to lose my mind,
And if it's all we only pass this way but once, what a perfect waste of time.
Comment