"That was my ration for the day"

[reddevil18]

:p I love Riley!

[OutandAboot]

Me too! The show need some "neutral character" who are not in the main plot but still not one of the extras, and Riley seems very likeable in that way.

[CSESL]

& indicates the next problem they will face, lack of water

[reddevil18]

& indicates the next problem they will face, lack of water
Actually, I'm pretty sure it's power first. THEN water...

[SG_Gundam]

Yea. It appears they have to ration their water. How much do they have? And is there facilities on board the Destiny that provides water that they haven't found yet or did they bring a limited supply of water with them when they evacuated Icarus?

[MechaThor]

Yea. It appears they have to ration their water. How much do they have? And is there facilities on board the Destiny that provides water that they haven't found yet or did they bring a limited supply of water with them when they evacuated Icarus?

All these questions and more should be answered in the upcoming weeks, (atleast I hope).

[reddevil18]

While this thread was dedicated to my man Riley and his delivery that always cracks me up...They have to ration water for now. The episode "Water" will deal with their...errr...water issues.

[SG_Gundam]

Oops. Yea. Sorry about that. Yea. Riley is a great neutral character. It's nice that the 'gate technician from the base survived. He's this series' Walter!

[The Destiny]

104 "Darkness (Part 1)
105 "Light (Part 2)
106 "Water"

Looking at the titles ( and the descriptions ;) ) it's pretty obvious they have power problems first and water next. Water will propably feature that ice planet where they use the suits.

Personally I assumed the destiny is generating power on it's own some way, sort off 'recharging' when out of FTL.

Speaking of FTL, noone thought of relativity yet?
And can you dail a gate while moving that fast..? 'cause they tried in Air II.

[jelgate]

Speaking of FTL, noone thought of relativity yet?
And can you dail a gate while moving that fast..? 'cause they tried in Air II.

FTL seems like a primitive form of hyperspace so I don't think relativity needs to be taken into effect.

And they never established a lock when then dialed in FTL. It would violate Stargate physics to make a lock while in fast movement.

[reddevil18]

104 "Darkness (Part 1)
105 "Light (Part 2)
106 "Water"

Looking at the titles ( and the descriptions ;) ) it's pretty obvious they have power problems first and water next. Water will propably feature that ice planet where they use the suits.

Personally I assumed the destiny is generating power on it's own some way, sort off 'recharging' when out of FTL.

Speaking of FTL, noone thought of relativity yet?
And can you dail a gate while moving that fast..? 'cause they tried in Air II.Maybe you should look around the board. Plenty of people have talked about FTL and time dilation. I'm sticking to my "warp drive-like" theory for now.

[Cold Fuzz]

Oops. Yea. Sorry about that. Yea. Riley is a great neutral character. It's nice that the 'gate technician from the base survived. He's this series' Walter!

Riley's great! Even though the main cast has a lot to do already, I think the secondary characters, people like Riley, Volker, and Franklin, are going to be built up to be quite prominent. I think we'll see Riley the most.

[aretood2]

He has big shoes...or dialing fingers, to fill.

[Duke Flipside]

He's this series' Walter!
That's exactly what I was thinking :p

[OutandAboot]

Riley's great! Even though the main cast has a lot to do already, I think the secondary characters,


Secondary character, thats's the word I was looking for. Riley is a great secondary character, now it's been said.

[Detox]

Stargate isn't Stargate with a Gate Tech who's the butt of everyone's jokes.

[Cold Fuzz]

Stargate isn't Stargate with a Gate Tech who's the butt of everyone's jokes.

Well, they could do something like that with Riley, though I think with the way the cool sarcasm is written for his character, he'd get continually more and more grumpy as a result. More grumpy = more sarcasm = more Riley? ;)

[techwork]

water water.... do you think as this problem was solved at stations Salute (Firework), Mir, ISS ? Nothing difficult. Even for commy. :)

[Detox]

Well, they could do something like that with Riley, though I think with the way the cool sarcasm is written for his character, he'd get continually more and more grumpy as a result. More grumpy = more sarcasm = more Riley? ;)

Man. They definitely have to make Riley just grumpier and grumpier each episode.

[Vapor]

Agreed.

"What happened to being smart?" :D

[Cold Fuzz]

Man. They definitely have to make Riley just grumpier and grumpier each episode.

If Riley's character being more and more unhappy means we get to see more and more of him, then I say bring on the problems. :D

Dale Volker, another minor character, is slated to appear 18 times this season. It's reasonable to conclude that Riley might appear in a similar number of episodes. That's a very good thing!

[Detox]

I would just like to see Riley return to Earth as a very infuriated individual.

[neiljward]

I love him to Walter mark II.

[_Famrir_]

riley reminds me of tesla from sanctuary for some reason

[JohnDuh]

:p I love Riley!



I thought it marked him as self centered and immature.

[reddevil18]

I thought it marked him as self centered and immature.You're on my LIST now. :mckay:

[jelgate]

Am I on the list?:P

[reddevil18]

Am I on the list?:PDepends. Do you love Riley and want a Riley action figure that delivers deadpan sarcasm?

[jelgate]

Depends. Do you love Riley and want a Riley action figure that delivers deadpan sarcasm?

Meh and I really couldn't care less

[reddevil18]

Meh and I really couldn't care lessYou're on the shortlist to make the LIST now. :mckay: Watch your step.

[MattSilver 3k]

I have a feeling that making another "Favourite Quotes/Moments" Thread would be useless, 'cause we'd all just say something along these lines:
"Anything Riley says."

[Lightning Ducj]

Anybody suspect that maybe he was being sarcastic and not literal in the remark?

[aretood2]

Anybody suspect that maybe he was being sarcastic and not literal in the remark?

that's how I saw it.