I have pondered over the zpm for some time. Thinking of how the technology works, the function of using subspace energy to generate usable energy.
It would seem to me that the zpm works on a principle of Zero mathematics or Null math, in which we measure the potential energy of a space and utilize it by taking it out of the space it occupies and then concentrate it into a single point (a singularity) whch has regulated out put of any number of radiations that exist.
For the sake of argument, lets say the main radiation of this singularity is muons and alpha radiation. Muons are harmless, and Alpha radiation can be turned into beta radiation by using some type of material as a transitory substance which collects the alpha radiation as it is bombarded, and releases electrons (beta radiation).
So first the break down of potential subspace, a lesson in null math;
We use numbers as a means of measuring, counting, and so on. However, math, as we use it currently is subject to many flaws which we deem exceptions to the standard rules. For example: 0/0 =0, 0/1= 0, 1/0= undefined and (where I= infinity) I/I=1, I/0=I, 0/I=0.
So the question is, how do we arrive at the numbers we do?
Most mathematicians use set theory to define numbers. That is we give a measure of a number an equivalence based on the number of cardinal (exact) pairings between more than one measures.
Let us use an example: I=Infinity, i=(I-x), cardinal sets are marked with an : (semi colon)
I:I is then one, there is one comparable and equal measures of a set.
I= a b c d e f g ...
I:I would then look like
aa
bb
cc
dd
...
Now I:i would not be 1, because there is an uncertain number of cardinal sets.
Assuming I is like the above example and i is A B C D...
then I:i
aA
bB
cC
dD
e?
f?
So what about zero and the other numbers? Imagine that we have a truly empty space. Nothing in it, no energy, nothing; we'd call this null and it's represented by the empty set->[]
[]:I would then be zero. There is no pairing between nothing and something. Unfortunately this gives two major headaches. One: 0/0 then equals 1 and Two: we have something between Nothing and Something, which we can define as null space, or subspace, or hyperspace. Your pick.
(Wait 0/0=1? 0~[]:I> ([]:I)/([]:I) nulls cancel out, they are nothing, you can't compare nothing to nothing. The division line acts as a cardinal set. I/I=1. How does the division line act like a cardinal set: Well lets take 2/2, you have two apples, and two more apples. Treat the first two apples as set X (I) and treat the second set of apples as set Y (I) I=I, so X:Y is a single pairing structure of exact cardinality, much like the example above of I:I, hence 2/2=1)
So what does this have to do with the zpm you mght ask. Well this is where it gets complicated, but we're all Stargate geeks so you should beable to follow this.
A singularity works on both a macro (our level) and micro (quantum level) state. The value on which it functions is in essence a cardinality between the macro and micro. What I mean here is that in the micro universe the quantum level, and even sub-quantum level, space is abundent. There is more null than I sort to speak. Between the particles of energy that make up the macro universe as we see it, there is space, and plenty of it. And at the quantum level such things like strings, and leap quantum gravity, (which personally I think are one in the same-lets not get me started on this) produce potential energy.
What potential energy: well a particle at the quantum state has innumerable possible states to be in. They react to the slightest of changes, they are as much a part of the actual functional state as they are of the potential state. A Singularity of any sort (black holes, wormholes, temporal rifts) rely on this potential energy. What could the quantum particles in this null comparison potentially do. We can measure that possibility with a fractalized set theory.
So let's set up a fractalized set theory, but to do that we need to first examine standard set theory.
Set theory works linearly, like we see numbers.
[]:I=0 (no cardinal pairs)
[]:I:I=1 (one set of cardinal pairs)
[]:I:I:I=2 (2 sets)
[]:I:I:I:I=3 (3 sets)
And most mathematicians uses that as a method of constructing numbers, but this is wrong past the number one.
Eamining the third grouping (number 2) a major flaw can be seen with the linear structure. That is as follows: Designating each I as a different value, x, y, z, []:x:y:z is 2 linearly, fractionalized, its 3.
[]:x=0
[]:y=0
[]:z=0
X:y=1
X:z=2
z:y=3
This fractionalized measuring system becomes exponential.
Examining linear number 3:
[]:x:y:z:a
x:y=1
x:z=2
x:a=3
y;z=4
y:a=5
z:a=6
In essence in a fractionalized set theory, we can measure potential in greater numbers of dimensions of a quantum function. And that is why a zpm should work. Because, a zpm relies on potential energy of a singularity. Where we measure the singularity as being at a measure of 3, its actually,at the quantum level, really using the potential energy of 4 dimensions.
Now I know this probably sounds crazy, but consider the measures of everyday life from that we use from a meta-dimension that is objective.
We not only measure what we assume, but also the potential variables as well.
Look at f=ma (force = mass * acceleration) Assuming we have a mass of 10kg
and a force of 160 newtons then the acceleration 16m/s^2
Lets examine that for a moment though.
10>[]:I:I:I:I;I
160>[]:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I
16>[]:I:I:I:I:I:I:I
if we follow the fractionalized rule, then we also have an equatable comparison for all other factors for a set potential value of each measure of the number.
So say we change the acceleration from 16m/s^2 to 14m/s^2 then the available potential answer would be supplied in the potential number set of 160newtons. Based on the displacement in the acceleration chart. So z:c is two less then 16. So the answer to the equatoin of force is two less then the 160 in the chart.
[]:x:y:z:a:b~
x:y 1
x:z 2
x:a 3
x:b 4
y:z 5
y:a 6
y:b 7
z:a 8
z:b 9
a:b 10
[]:x:y:z:a:b:c:d
x:y 1
:z 2
:a 3
:b 4
:c 5
:d 6
y:z 7
:a 8
:b 9
:c 10
:d 11
z:a 12
:b 13
:c 14
:d 15
a:b 16
:c 17
:d 18
b:c 19
:d 20
c:d 21
If we keep 160 maximized (which its not technically speaking) and keep 10 maximized which it is (its the top of its potential limit) then
16 at group a:b of the linear cardinal set 7 may produce the answer, as well as a:d, a:c, z:d, and z:c so we a potential range with a number of potential answers.
Examining: z:c (14) maintaining the maximized 10kg, the force would
Using
[]:__x:__y:__z:__a:__b:__c:__d:__e:__f:__g:__h:__i:__j
x 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013
y 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 021 022 023 024 025 026
z 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 036 037 038 039
a 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052
b 053 054 055 056 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065
c 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 074 075 076 077 078
d 079 080 081 082 083 084 085 086 087 088 089 090 091
e 092 093 094 095 096 097 098 099 100 101 102 103 104
f 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117
g 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130
h 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143
i 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 152 153 154 155 156 157
j 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170
So the answer should be 140 newtons. line H is two sets beind J and the exponential relative of 2 behind in the acceleration chart is 18 behind (2*9)
If we put the acceleration above 16, say 17.
f=10*17, 17 is only one set ahead of 16 in the acceleration chart, thus (1*9) numbers away. F=170.
So the validity of null math works even with conventional numbers if applied right. It shows potential as well as actual information based on a relative exponentiality which is very similar to leap quantum gravity and string theory.
It would seem to me that the zpm works on a principle of Zero mathematics or Null math, in which we measure the potential energy of a space and utilize it by taking it out of the space it occupies and then concentrate it into a single point (a singularity) whch has regulated out put of any number of radiations that exist.
For the sake of argument, lets say the main radiation of this singularity is muons and alpha radiation. Muons are harmless, and Alpha radiation can be turned into beta radiation by using some type of material as a transitory substance which collects the alpha radiation as it is bombarded, and releases electrons (beta radiation).
So first the break down of potential subspace, a lesson in null math;
We use numbers as a means of measuring, counting, and so on. However, math, as we use it currently is subject to many flaws which we deem exceptions to the standard rules. For example: 0/0 =0, 0/1= 0, 1/0= undefined and (where I= infinity) I/I=1, I/0=I, 0/I=0.
So the question is, how do we arrive at the numbers we do?
Most mathematicians use set theory to define numbers. That is we give a measure of a number an equivalence based on the number of cardinal (exact) pairings between more than one measures.
Let us use an example: I=Infinity, i=(I-x), cardinal sets are marked with an : (semi colon)
I:I is then one, there is one comparable and equal measures of a set.
I= a b c d e f g ...
I:I would then look like
aa
bb
cc
dd
...
Now I:i would not be 1, because there is an uncertain number of cardinal sets.
Assuming I is like the above example and i is A B C D...
then I:i
aA
bB
cC
dD
e?
f?
So what about zero and the other numbers? Imagine that we have a truly empty space. Nothing in it, no energy, nothing; we'd call this null and it's represented by the empty set->[]
[]:I would then be zero. There is no pairing between nothing and something. Unfortunately this gives two major headaches. One: 0/0 then equals 1 and Two: we have something between Nothing and Something, which we can define as null space, or subspace, or hyperspace. Your pick.
(Wait 0/0=1? 0~[]:I> ([]:I)/([]:I) nulls cancel out, they are nothing, you can't compare nothing to nothing. The division line acts as a cardinal set. I/I=1. How does the division line act like a cardinal set: Well lets take 2/2, you have two apples, and two more apples. Treat the first two apples as set X (I) and treat the second set of apples as set Y (I) I=I, so X:Y is a single pairing structure of exact cardinality, much like the example above of I:I, hence 2/2=1)
So what does this have to do with the zpm you mght ask. Well this is where it gets complicated, but we're all Stargate geeks so you should beable to follow this.
A singularity works on both a macro (our level) and micro (quantum level) state. The value on which it functions is in essence a cardinality between the macro and micro. What I mean here is that in the micro universe the quantum level, and even sub-quantum level, space is abundent. There is more null than I sort to speak. Between the particles of energy that make up the macro universe as we see it, there is space, and plenty of it. And at the quantum level such things like strings, and leap quantum gravity, (which personally I think are one in the same-lets not get me started on this) produce potential energy.
What potential energy: well a particle at the quantum state has innumerable possible states to be in. They react to the slightest of changes, they are as much a part of the actual functional state as they are of the potential state. A Singularity of any sort (black holes, wormholes, temporal rifts) rely on this potential energy. What could the quantum particles in this null comparison potentially do. We can measure that possibility with a fractalized set theory.
So let's set up a fractalized set theory, but to do that we need to first examine standard set theory.
Set theory works linearly, like we see numbers.
[]:I=0 (no cardinal pairs)
[]:I:I=1 (one set of cardinal pairs)
[]:I:I:I=2 (2 sets)
[]:I:I:I:I=3 (3 sets)
And most mathematicians uses that as a method of constructing numbers, but this is wrong past the number one.
Eamining the third grouping (number 2) a major flaw can be seen with the linear structure. That is as follows: Designating each I as a different value, x, y, z, []:x:y:z is 2 linearly, fractionalized, its 3.
[]:x=0
[]:y=0
[]:z=0
X:y=1
X:z=2
z:y=3
This fractionalized measuring system becomes exponential.
Examining linear number 3:
[]:x:y:z:a
x:y=1
x:z=2
x:a=3
y;z=4
y:a=5
z:a=6
In essence in a fractionalized set theory, we can measure potential in greater numbers of dimensions of a quantum function. And that is why a zpm should work. Because, a zpm relies on potential energy of a singularity. Where we measure the singularity as being at a measure of 3, its actually,at the quantum level, really using the potential energy of 4 dimensions.
Now I know this probably sounds crazy, but consider the measures of everyday life from that we use from a meta-dimension that is objective.
We not only measure what we assume, but also the potential variables as well.
Look at f=ma (force = mass * acceleration) Assuming we have a mass of 10kg
and a force of 160 newtons then the acceleration 16m/s^2
Lets examine that for a moment though.
10>[]:I:I:I:I;I
160>[]:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I:I
16>[]:I:I:I:I:I:I:I
if we follow the fractionalized rule, then we also have an equatable comparison for all other factors for a set potential value of each measure of the number.
So say we change the acceleration from 16m/s^2 to 14m/s^2 then the available potential answer would be supplied in the potential number set of 160newtons. Based on the displacement in the acceleration chart. So z:c is two less then 16. So the answer to the equatoin of force is two less then the 160 in the chart.
[]:x:y:z:a:b~
x:y 1
x:z 2
x:a 3
x:b 4
y:z 5
y:a 6
y:b 7
z:a 8
z:b 9
a:b 10
[]:x:y:z:a:b:c:d
x:y 1
:z 2
:a 3
:b 4
:c 5
:d 6
y:z 7
:a 8
:b 9
:c 10
:d 11
z:a 12
:b 13
:c 14
:d 15
a:b 16
:c 17
:d 18
b:c 19
:d 20
c:d 21
If we keep 160 maximized (which its not technically speaking) and keep 10 maximized which it is (its the top of its potential limit) then
16 at group a:b of the linear cardinal set 7 may produce the answer, as well as a:d, a:c, z:d, and z:c so we a potential range with a number of potential answers.
Examining: z:c (14) maintaining the maximized 10kg, the force would
Using
[]:__x:__y:__z:__a:__b:__c:__d:__e:__f:__g:__h:__i:__j
x 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013
y 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 021 022 023 024 025 026
z 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 036 037 038 039
a 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052
b 053 054 055 056 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065
c 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 074 075 076 077 078
d 079 080 081 082 083 084 085 086 087 088 089 090 091
e 092 093 094 095 096 097 098 099 100 101 102 103 104
f 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117
g 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130
h 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143
i 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 152 153 154 155 156 157
j 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170
So the answer should be 140 newtons. line H is two sets beind J and the exponential relative of 2 behind in the acceleration chart is 18 behind (2*9)
If we put the acceleration above 16, say 17.
f=10*17, 17 is only one set ahead of 16 in the acceleration chart, thus (1*9) numbers away. F=170.
So the validity of null math works even with conventional numbers if applied right. It shows potential as well as actual information based on a relative exponentiality which is very similar to leap quantum gravity and string theory.
Comment