Ok im just a little curious. When an F302 launches out of the Deadule's hanger bay dose it do it by its own power or is it connected to a catupult lie modern day Air Craft carriers do? I mean it dosnt seem like it but when they do a close up of the bays i see somethng that looks like a catuplut.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Question about the 302 bays
Collapse
X
-
no, they launch out of their own power. afterall, they are in space so they dont actually have to reach any specific speed to maintain flight and if they were in atmosphere for some reason, the hangar looks long enough to allow enough runway for takeoff even then.STARGATE ROCKS
THERE IS NO BETTER SHOW
-
Originally posted by stargater1990 View Postno, they launch out of their own power. afterall, they are in space so they dont actually have to reach any specific speed to maintain flight and if they were in atmosphere for some reason, the hangar looks long enough to allow enough runway for takeoff even then.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stargater1990 View Postno, they launch out of their own power. afterall, they are in space so they dont actually have to reach any specific speed to maintain flight and if they were in atmosphere for some reason, the hangar looks long enough to allow enough runway for takeoff even then.
That said, they seem to have an incredibly slow minimum velocity. Look at 'Allies' where the two 302s are escorting the Wraith ship into Atlantis. They almost hover in mid air as it lands.
It would be logical however that the 302s would want to be traveling as fast as possible before leaving the protection of the hangar. I would think that they would (or could, in combat conditions) be launched from a catapult, so they are at maximum speed as they leave the hangar.
In SG they have the technology to accelerate a rail gun round to Mach 5 in just over a metre, I'm sure a futuristic catapult could accelerate a 302 to Mach 5 or higher in a 50m or so.Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity!
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gate-builder View PostThe 302 seems to have a very short takeoff anyway, just watch the episode 'Covenant'And now it's time for one last bow, like all your other selves. Eleven's hour is over now... the clock is striking Twelve's.
sigpic
Stargate Ragnarok | FF.net | AO3 | Lakeside | My Fallout 3 Mods | Poppy Appeal | Help For Heroes | Combat Stress
Comment
-
I agree the 302s must just leave the hangers under their own power, once in space they can just move forward without the need of a slingshot and continue to build up some speed inside of the 304's shield if their mother ship is in battle and they need it to avoid getting hit as they leave the ship.
The bays seem large enough too me to allow the 302s to gain all the momentum they need before leaving the solid ground of the hangers.
Comment
-
Should I be the one to point out that when in atmospheric flight, the thin g should rip itself to pieces? Its forward swept wings create a cushion of air that would slow it down. but its meant to go crazy speeds exo and endo, in which case it would shake itself to pieces.
IT SHOULDN'T FLY!!!!sigpic
385 Heroes coming Home
Here's to smart Mods
Comment
-
Originally posted by Splitsecond View PostI thought 302s had VTOL (vertical take-off and landing) capability like the British-made Harrier.
Look at its landing gear. there is no way it could make high speed, high impact landings onto those legs. No way!!!sigpic
385 Heroes coming Home
Here's to smart Mods
Comment
-
Originally posted by Splitsecond View PostI thought 302s had VTOL (vertical take-off and landing) capability like the British-made Harrier.Originally posted by Garrowan5th View PostI think it does, actually. It would make sense, with all the lien tech thrown in.
Look at its landing gear. there is no way it could make high speed, high impact landings onto those legs. No way!!!
Maybe it is VTOL by virtue of RCS thrusters like the Space Shuttle (although it doesn't look like it), and while these are pretty weak jets suited only for space on the Shuttle, could have been supercharged for a smaller combat vehicle that relies on speed, agility, high-g turns and the like. Maybe they are powerful enough to work in an atmosphere and Earth-like gravity field. Bit unlikely, but hey, it's Stargate.
EDIT: If the inertial dampening tech has the effect of reducing the fighter's apparent mass to aid acceleration and manoeuvring, the RCS thruster theory becomes much stronger.And now it's time for one last bow, like all your other selves. Eleven's hour is over now... the clock is striking Twelve's.
sigpic
Stargate Ragnarok | FF.net | AO3 | Lakeside | My Fallout 3 Mods | Poppy Appeal | Help For Heroes | Combat Stress
Comment
-
Originally posted by Garrowan5th View PostShould I be the one to point out that when in atmospheric flight, the thin g should rip itself to pieces? Its forward swept wings create a cushion of air that would slow it down. but its meant to go crazy speeds exo and endo, in which case it would shake itself to pieces.
IT SHOULDN'T FLY!!!!
And that was without Inertial Dampeners and Trinium.When the time comes to utilize Earth's best weaponry against an ailen threat. The weapon that will ultimately prove to be Earth's best will be the Zatnikitel
Zatnikitelman
Comment
-
Originally posted by Garrowan5th View PostI think it does, actually. It would make sense, with all the lien tech thrown in.
Look at its landing gear. there is no way it could make high speed, high impact landings onto those legs. No way!!!
now the x301 had vertical take of and landing but that was essientally a death glider and they said that they still didint know what made the goauld engines tick so they wouldnt have been able to incorporate VTOL, but thats not the case now, if we wanted to we could proboly use some asgard tech to give the 302s inertialess drives like puddle jumpers and then they would be far more manuverable and wouldnt need jet fuel anymore.STARGATE ROCKS
THERE IS NO BETTER SHOW
Comment
Comment