Originally posted by ForeverSg1
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sam Carter/Amanda Tapping Discussion/Appreciation
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by astrogeologistArgh! Can't remember where I read it... and the 'search this thread' feature hasn't been working right since they moved to the new server... I scanned through the last several pages on Joe's thread and couldn't find it... So I'll open the question up - who remembers where 'they' say that the viewers are going to be 'blown away' when they find out why Sam comes back to Stargate Command? Was it in someone's post from the recent convention?Spoiler:the leadership at Home World Security are going to all be civilians
...You're ALWAYS Welcome in Samanda: Amanda's Community of New Fans and Old Friends...
Comment
-
Originally posted by ÜberSG-1FanI have had an equally difficult time trying to find where I thought Joe had said thatSpoiler:the leadership at Home World Security are going to all be civilians
Comment
-
I don't know why.....but I just don't think they're going to put a Tok'ra in Sam. I think wherever Sam is working, it's on something that will pull the new storylines forward. I think that's what will "blow us away."
I also think Sam will be leading the team, although I wish Mitchell had been a Captain or a Major. But I still feel fairly certain on these two points. They just make sense.
The only thing (as you know) that concerns me is how they will treat the integrity of the J/S Ship. I'm too worried about that issue to see things clearly!
Comment
-
Originally posted by ÜberSG-1FanI have had an equally difficult time trying to find where I thought Joe had said thatSpoiler:the leadership at Home World Security are going to all be civiliansSpoiler:if Sam and Hammond are off doing something together? Or if anyone has asked about Hammond at all? I just haven't heard anything about him, as to why he isn't head of Homeland Security anymore.
My LJ
Comment
-
Originally posted by sg-1fanintnI don't know why.....but I just don't think they're going to put a Tok'ra in Sam. I think wherever Sam is working, it's on something that will pull the new storylines forward. I think that's what will "blow us away."
I also think Sam will be leading the team, although I wish Mitchell had been a Captain or a Major. But I still feel fairly certain on these two points. They just make sense.
.
Spoilers for Threads below, and more speculation on Sam in Season 9
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
Originally posted by sg-1fanintnThe only thing (as you know) that concerns me is how they will treat the integrity of the J/S Ship. I'm too worried about that issue to see things clearly!
Comment
-
Originally posted by coleyColey
MajorSal and Astro - I just love your avators - is that what they are?Originally posted by majorsalthanks. i didn't make it, though; it's one of the avatar options for me to use. (wish i'd made it)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Strix variaThe thing that worries me about season 9 is the fact that (I don't know if I need to spoiler this or not, but I'm going to, just to be safe)Spoiler:Sam is "out of the loop" for so long. By necessity, they're having to start the first several episodes without her, focusing attention on the other characters. I have no doubt that CJ and MS think that season 9 is awesome, after all, they're going to have the limelight in the beginning. Nothing wrong with that, but they're going to establish their own chemistry with the new characters, and they're going to be established as the main players in the new theme of the season. I mean, it seems pretty obvious that the writers are taking things in a new direction, and the new direction has a certain amount of cohesion to it, just like the first eight seasons had the on-going theme of the battle with the goa'uld.
So Sam being gone in the beginning leaves her out of all of this new stuff in the crucial development stage. I'm afraid she's going to be brought back in as sort of an after-thought.... oh, and by the way, Sam's back! Now to continue with our story where we left off... Plus, if the writers aren't careful, they could easily bring her back in such a way as to disrupt whatever chemistry has been established between the new characters in the first episodes, opening her up to criticism from the fans. If they set up BB in such a way that the fans fall in love with him, love him in charge, love him leading SG-1, it could be really bad for Sam.
another thing i'm fretting on is that i'm not sure how much of an 'adventure' i want sam going on while she's gone for the those five or six eps. i've had so many things kept from me as an s/j shipper that i don't want that to happen as a sam fan too. i want to SEE what she's been doing for those few weeks.
i agree, Strix varia, i don't want sam's return (and place in the hearts of her friends) to be replaced by the new ppl that had time to establish 'their' place while sam was gone. i guess i'm just afraid that sam (and amanda) are going to be put on the back burner or something.
we still don't know if sam's coming back in the fifth or sixth ep, so i'm hoping it's the fifth (and one we haven't really heard about) so that a BIG deal is made of it.
(((((sam)))))
(((((amanda)))))
sallysally
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by astrogeologistSpeculation for Season 9
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
(snip)
Of course... my *unhappy* predictionSpoiler:that Sam gets Tokrafied would remove that friction as the Air Force would not put a Tokra in charge of SG-1, so BB would stand as the sole member of SG-1 who was 'simply military'
I've been thinking of posting my question on the Joe Mallozzi threadSpoiler:The question being: Is Sam going to get Tokrafied in Season 9?Spoiler:Tokrafying Sam
Hmmm... Astrog mentally paces...
sallysally
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by astrogeologistAt this point, I think they've already decided how they are bringing Sam back... What was it they said... they hadn't seen any fan posting or discussion that had guessed it correctly yet - and that they expect the fans to be 'blown away' when they the reason she comes back...?
sam's returning married to jack =
sam's returning as a tok'ra =
where did you hear/read this, astro?
sallysally
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Skydiverya know, sam is sorta doomed no matter what she does
she doesn't have any weaknesses, then she's 'super sam' and totally unbelievable and made fun of for her lack of weaknesses
then she's given some. she's made human and falliable and she's bagged on for that
like dudes, cut her some slack.
other characters are always given the benefit of the doubt and their faults are looked upon as a sign of cuteness or an endearing quality. so let's do the same for sam
Lt. Col. Samantha Carter: "Will the people who are saying I'm a weak and pathetic character, please take one step forward..."
Now, I tried to explain to the good Colonel that some might perceive her response as, well, less than cordial and perhaps even a smidge hostile...
...I'm afraid I cannot post her reply in mixed company...
Last edited by Uber; 19 April 2005, 04:09 PM.
...You're ALWAYS Welcome in Samanda: Amanda's Community of New Fans and Old Friends...
Comment
-
Originally posted by astrogeologistArgh! Can't remember where I read it... and the 'search this thread' feature hasn't been working right since they moved to the new server... I scanned through the last several pages on Joe's thread and couldn't find it... So I'll open the question up - who remembers where 'they' say that the viewers are going to be 'blown away' when they find out why Sam comes back to Stargate Command? Was it in someone's post from the recent convention?
sallysally
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by ÜberSG-1FanI received an email from Lieutenant Colonel Samantha Carter today. She apparently is not pleased that some feel she's not a strong character. In fact, she attached these pictures and ordered me to post this caption verbatim to make her point:
Lt. Col. Samantha Carter: "Will the people who are saying I'm a weak and pathetic character, please take one step forward..."
Now, I tried to explain to the good Colonel that some might perceive her response as, well, less than cordial and perhaps even a smidge hostile...
...I'm afraid I cannot post her reply in mixed company...
Comment
Comment