The list goes on, doesn't it? He's an archeologist, sure, but I'd just like to point out that archeology studies do not include all the stuff he does. I mean, he's also a historian and quite a good one (not the same thing, trust me) and knows suprisingly much about anthropology, egyptology, practically all kinds of mythology and linguistics. I mean, am I the only one who finds that a bit... surreal at best? Especially at his age.
Or do US universities really train super-historians?
Or do US universities really train super-historians?
Comment