Now I know the F302 is armed with missiles but what else is it armed with? I have heard someone say Machine guns while another said railguns. Can someone know?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
F302 weapons?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
No, at present I don't believe the F-302 is armed with rail guns or gun, as for machine guns, yes some type of rapid fire projectile weapon is probably part of the F-302s' armament. Mostly they have diffrent types of missles, and regular projectile weapons. Perhaps a weapons of atomic power at one time or another and every now and then they enhance something with naquadah.
Oh, and welcome to the forum! I hope you like it here!
Owen Macri
-
Originally posted by Owen MacriNo, at present I don't believe the F-302 is armed with rail guns or gun, as for machine guns, yes some type of rapid fire projectile weapon is probably part of the F-302s' armament. Mostly they have diffrent types of missles, and regular projectile weapons. Perhaps a weapons of atomic power at one time or another and every now and then they enhance something with naquadah.
Originally posted by Owen Macri
Oh, and welcome to the forum! I hope you like it here!
Owen Macri
Watch the episode in Antartica, where they were fighting anubis's forces
Comment
-
Oh I'm sorry, I didn't think I was arguing with you. Sorry.
Rail guns are very large, perhaps one rail gun, the only problem is inertia, in space there is nothing (usually) holding you in place with a gun firing projectiles at speeds near and above mach 5, there is definetly going to be some force pushing you backwards, if the gun is aimed forwards.
I hope you enjoy it here!
Owen Macri
Comment
-
Originally posted by Owen MacriOh I'm sorry, I didn't think I was arguing with you. Sorry.
Originally posted by Owen MacriOh
Rail guns are very large, perhaps one rail gun, the only problem is inertia, in space there is nothing (usually) holding you in place with a gun firing projectiles at speeds near and above mach 5, there is definetly going to be some force pushing you backwards, if the gun is aimed forwards.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Owen MacriOh I'm sorry, I didn't think I was arguing with you. Sorry.
Rail guns are very large, perhaps one rail gun, the only problem is inertia, in space there is nothing (usually) holding you in place with a gun firing projectiles at speeds near and above mach 5, there is definetly going to be some force pushing you backwards, if the gun is aimed forwards.
I hope you enjoy it here!
Owen Macri
HER'AK: "No matter what you have endured, you have never experienced the likes of what Anubis is capable of."
O'NEILL:"You ended that sentence with a preposition. *******!"
Comment
-
It probaly has vulcan cannons and also seems to have amrams(i think thats the spelling).Rimmer: "What's this? Learning drugs? They're illegal, matey! Where did you get them? I'm afraid you're in very serious, grave, deep trouble, Lister. Where did you get them? I want names, I want places, I want dates."
Lister: "Arnold Rimmer, his locker, this morning."
- Rimmer and Lister, Balance of Power from Red Dwarf
Ambassador: I hate you English. With your boring trousers and your shiny toilet paper and your ridiculous preconceptions that Frenchmen are great lovers. I'm French and I'm hung like a baby carrot and a couple of petits pois.
- Nob and Nobility from Blackadder
Comment
-
Originally posted by Owen MacriRail guns are very large, perhaps one rail gun, the only problem is inertia, in space there is nothing (usually) holding you in place with a gun firing projectiles at speeds near and above mach 5, there is definetly going to be some force pushing you backwards, if the gun is aimed forwards.
I wish Colonel Everett had given the railgun's projectile velocity in meters per second, as projectiles are usually categorized. "Mach" is a very uncertain number depending upon your location, but if we presume he uses Mach 1 = 765 mph, then we can calculate the railguns fire a projectile at close to 1600mps. Most military "high-power rifles" do not exceed 2,000 mps (and the ones that do kick like a mule). If you want, the Wikipedia page has the equations necessary to calculate the recoil.
Comment
-
If you want, the Wikipedia page has the equations necessary to calculate the recoil.
Equations? You really only need one.
I don't see any weaponry on the 302 at all, nor any cowlings in the wings where they could be fired from, add to that the fact that Hammond implied that a 302 that has expended its ordinance is worthless. I believe the 302s only have missile hardpoints.Lord §okar, Niles, Mark VI, etc: Dom Howard fan
Tama, Bosphorus, Istanbul Mehmet, Sabian, Zildjian and Remo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lord §okarIf you want, the Wikipedia page has the equations necessary to calculate the recoil.
Equations? You really only need one.
I don't see any weaponry on the 302 at all, nor any cowlings in the wings where they could be fired from, add to that the fact that Hammond implied that a 302 that has expended its ordinance is worthless. I believe the 302s only have missile hardpoints.
Not the best picture, but it definately has guns of some kind or another.Jarnin's Law of StarGate:
1. As a StarGate discussion grows longer, the probability of someone mentioning the Furlings approaches one.
Comment
Comment