So is it going to be 'lotr movie' long?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Harry Potter Discussion and Appreciation Thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by DavidI have yet to read the book, though I wouldn't consider myself lost, but dissapointed. I didn't feel like there was an ending. No Baselisk to stick it to. In fact, I the "ending" was in act four and then replayed again in act five from a distance. I didn't expect it to end with Harry on a broom
Out of the three films it is my least favorite.
So I finally watched the movie a few days ago, and I was surprised to find out how good it was. Must have been at least two years since I read the third book, and I had forgotten almost all the details, so I didn't notice the lack of details in the movie.
I would have wished that there was one or two more scenes with Harry and Lupin to explain what's going on, but I am glad that they focused more on the end bit. And I liked that there were no big Quidditch scenes (except for that one). I can't stay focused when I have to read a 30 pages Quidditch game, and I also don't like 15 min Quidditch straight on screen (and I find that Harry on the broom looks just fake, although I would say that the VFX department is doing a good job with all the other things).
Anyway, does somebody know who'll be directing the fourth movie? The same guy as with this movie?No, 'Eureka' is Greek for 'This bath is too hot.'
"Because only an extremely deranged individual would think of doing what we're doing."
(LOST producer Damon Lindelof, May 2007)
Comment
-
Originally posted by petzke_42It was a little under 3 hours I believe...it was pretty long, but if you enjoyed the last two movies, you won't even notice it.Amanda, "Wallow Central."
Comment
-
The fact that they aren't going to turn it into 2 movies doesn't necessarily mean that it's going to a super long movie. What it probably means is that they're going to cut the heck out of it. There already was an article that said they were most likey going to cut the Dursely's out of the Goblet of Fire movie completely. I just don't know about that, it seems so wrong.
It was, is, and always will be GREEN
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShipperahoyThe fact that they aren't going to turn it into 2 movies doesn't necessarily mean that it's going to a super long movie. What it probably means is that they're going to cut the heck out of it. There already was an article that said they were most likey going to cut the Dursely's out of the Goblet of Fire movie completely. I just don't know about that, it seems so wrong.
I agree. So the longer the book is, the less you get put of the movie because they cut out several important(to me anyway) parts of the book. The movies ending was diffrent then the ending in the book because the ending was cut out. (I like the ending in the book to)Teal'C: Bla Bla Bla... Said the whole transcript of the
where all of the Stargates were.
O'Neill: Did you say something??
___________________________________________
Keep it up admids and mods!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShipperahoyThe fact that they aren't going to turn it into 2 movies doesn't necessarily mean that it's going to a super long movie. What it probably means is that they're going to cut the heck out of it. There already was an article that said they were most likey going to cut the Dursely's out of the Goblet of Fire movie completely. I just don't know about that, it seems so wrong.Amanda, "Wallow Central."
Comment
-
Dursley is not a character. They are Harrys uncle, aunt and fat cousin. They are the Dursleys. They have a small but important roll in Harry Potter. Its funny seeing Harry doing things to the Dursleys.Teal'C: Bla Bla Bla... Said the whole transcript of the
where all of the Stargates were.
O'Neill: Did you say something??
___________________________________________
Keep it up admids and mods!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by littlemigueljrThe LOTR movies (all three of them) were cut up as well, and were still pretty long, but yah... I haven't read any of the Harry Potter books, but wasn't Dursely an important, but small character?
It was, is, and always will be GREEN
Comment
Comment